Hi,
can you provide a short XSL-FO (not XSLT) with equivalent images that
reproduce what you describe here, I cannot figure what you say.
Le 20/01/2012 16:29, Klearchos Klearchou a écrit :
Hello Pascal,
the solution that we talked about works well almost in all cases.
Here is the code:
Hi Pascal,
I copied some of the FO.
In case you want to see more please let me know.
This FO text is relevant to the image that renders bad (not scaled)
fo:block start-indent=10px font-size=8px font-family=arial/
fo:table width=100% table-layout=fixed
fo:table-column
Klearchos,
I cannot reproduce what you get with the provided snippet: too small.
What FOP version do you use?
Le 23/01/2012 10:55, Klearchos Klearchou a écrit :
Hi Pascal,
I copied some of the FO.
In case you want to see more please let me know.
This FO text is relevant to the image that
Pascal,
I am using FOP 1.0 with:
Batik: 1.7+r608262
xmlgraphics-commons-1.4
Thank you.
On 23/1/2012 3:00 PM, Pascal Sancho wrote:
Klearchos,
I cannot reproduce what you get with the provided snippet: too small.
What FOP version do you use?
Le 23/01/2012 10:55, Klearchos Klearchou a écrit :
according to
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-page-position
, value only not supported
Can anyone confirm that this is up to date? I ask because in searching for
information on this, I came across a bugzilla item (I think for version
0.95) that supposedly fixed a
There is indeed a strange bug with the stock FOP 1.0 (and in trunk too...).
Klearchos, if you set one of the dimensions to 90.01mm in the code below
then you get the behavior you want. An easy workaround for now.
On 1/23/12 1:21 PM, Klearchos Klearchou wrote:
Pascal,
I am using FOP 1.0
