Hi,
I tested with many formulas and didn't find any problem. It seems to
work as it should.
Note that I had a failed automatic test when compiling JEuclid Core :
Results :
Failed tests:
testConverterSVGtoDOM(net.sourceforge.jeuclid.test.ConverterTest)
Tests run: 56, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Thanks everyone.
--
*NeoDoc*
*Maxime Bégnis*
max...@neodoc.fr
Tél: +33 (0)4.42.52.24.20
789 Rue de La Gare
13770 Venelles
France
http://www.neodoc.fr/
Le 26/03/2019 à 17:48, Simon Steiner a écrit :
Hi,
The developer of JEuclid will need to be contacted to update their
code to work with the newer batik.
Thanks
*From:*Dean Nelson <dnel...@metriguard.com>
*Sent:* 26 March 2019 16:38
*To:* fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
*Subject:* RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
All,
It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version that could be used with
2.3. Right now I am stuck with FOP 2.2 because of this change. Right
now I don’t see any other way to support MathML natively like jEuclid
in FOP without a lot of rework.
Has anyone tested https://github.com/rototor/jeuclid ?
Regards,
Dean Nelson
*From:*Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com
<mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>>
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:32 AM
*To:* fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
*Subject:* RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
Hi,
In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the
namespace since we don’t own org.w3c.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1216
Thanks
*From:*Maxime Bégnis <max...@neodoc.fr <mailto:max...@neodoc.fr>>
*Sent:* 26 March 2019 08:21
*To:* fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
*Subject:* FOP 2.3 and JEuclid
Hello,
There is an incompatibility between FOP 2.3 and JEuclid 3.1.9. This
because FOP uses Batik 1.10.
The class "org.w3c.dom.events.CustomEvent" in Batik 1.8 has be moved
to "org.apache.batik.w3c.dom.events.CustomEvent" in Batik 1.10.
That's the problem I could spot but I don't know if there are others.
I modified and recompile JEuclid core simply changing the import
statement in net.sourceforge.jeuclid.elements.presentation.token.Mo
and that fixed the issue but I didn't make any intensive test yet.
Attached is the patch.
Is that a known issue? If so, is there a well known way to fix it?
Thanks,
--
--
*Neo**Doc*
*Maxime Bégnis*
max...@neodoc.fr <mailto:max...@neodoc.fr>
Tél: +33 (0)4.42.52.24.20
789 Rue de La Gare
13770 Venelles
France
http://www.neodoc.fr/