There is indeed something not quite right, I think. As long as I play
with cell content or with min-height on table-cell (FOP Trunk/1.0), the
behaviour seems to be what's expected. However, if you start setting
min-height on the second table-row, nothing happens. The layouter
doesn't seem to
Hi Pascal,
So, is height property supported on fo:table-row by FOP?
FOP compliance page says yes (not partial) on height support, and XSL-FO
specification says this property is applicable to fo:table-row. Yet, I cannot
get it to work. Am I doing something wrong?
Regards,
Alexey.
On
Hi Alexey
this Exception issue seems to be fixed in FOP 1.0 (I've noticed in the
pdf attached to your initial post that you used FOP 0.95).
I suggest you to upgrade, at least min-height will work as expected
without any Exception.
Pascal
Le 14/09/2010 22:10, Alexey Neyman a écrit :
Hi Pascal,
Hi Pascal,
Just tried. While there is no exception, fo:table-row min-height=1em still
does not work in FOP 1.0 (still no effect whatsoever). See quoted email as to
why fo:table-cell height=... is not sufficient to solve this issue.
Regards,
Alexey.
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:35:00 am
Actually, test case can be reduced even more. Desired result:
AB
AC
DC
Essential XSL-FO code:
fo:table
fo:table-body
fo:table-row
fo:table-cell number-rows-spanned=2
fo:blockA/fo:block
/fo:table-cell
fo:table-cell
fo:blockB/fo:block
/fo:table-cell
/fo:table-row
Hi,
I think the behaviour is correct here:
Cells height is not sufficient to see the effect you want.
try to increase the height of vertically spanned cells (by setting the
height property to 2em) and you will see what I mean.
Pascal
Le 13/09/2010 22:39, Alexey Neyman a écrit :
fo:table
Hi Pascal,
I see your point, although this advice is not particularly useful to what I am
doing. As I mentioned, this table is generated by DocBook, and its templates
for tables are probably the most convoluted in the whole stylesheet. I was
trying to avoid heavy customizations of these
Hi All,
I am trying to format a table with cells spanning as shown below:
AAB
AAC
DEC
To do this, I am using attached .fo file (it is actually a stripped-down
DocBook-generated table). The essential piece is:
fo:table
fo:table-body
fo:table-row
fo:table-cell number-rows-spanned=2
Actually, test case can be reduced even more. Desired result:
AB
AC
DC
Essential XSL-FO code:
fo:table
fo:table-body
fo:table-row
fo:table-cell number-rows-spanned=2
fo:blockA/fo:block
/fo:table-cell
fo:table-cell
fo:blockB/fo:block
/fo:table-cell
/fo:table-row
I found a workaround for this. An zero-width column can be added to the table:
fo:table-column column-width=proportional-column-width(0)/
And then, add fo:table-cellfo:block#160;/fo:block/fo:table-cell to
the problematic row. This causes a warning about area overflow, but looks
okay.
Ugly,
10 matches
Mail list logo
