Re: PNG vs JPG in performance

2010-08-13 Thread Matthias Reischenbacher
Jeremias, do you have a patch file of your work with PNG? Perhaps with a second pair of eyes we could resolve that issue... ;-) Regards, Matthias On 13.08.2010 12:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Matthias is right. The PNGs need to be decoded and re-encoded. Some time ago I've made experiments to

Re: PNG vs JPG in performance

2010-08-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Matthias is right. The PNGs need to be decoded and re-encoded. Some time ago I've made experiments to embed PNG files without re-encoding them but I haven't gotten that to work. Somehow the data was not quite right so Acrobat barked at me with its usual unhelpful error messages. :-( At the moment t

Re: PNG vs JPG in performance

2010-08-13 Thread Ognjen Blagojevic
Hi Matthias, Do zou know to which format are they trasformed? Regards, Ognjen On 13.8.2010 14:37, Matthias Reischenbacher wrote: Hi Adam, I think the cause of the 30sec delay is that PNGs aren't embedded natively into the PDF and they must be transcoded first. It would be really nice, if the

Re: PNG vs JPG in performance

2010-08-13 Thread Matthias Reischenbacher
Hi Adam, I think the cause of the 30sec delay is that PNGs aren't embedded natively into the PDF and they must be transcoded first. It would be really nice, if the FOP-Team could fix this issue, since this problem also occurs when using PNGs inside SVGs and converting PNGs to JPEGs isn't so ea

PNG vs JPG in performance

2010-08-13 Thread Adam Kovacs
Hi there! Im currently having a strange effect. I use PNG images in my XSL to create PDFs. I have real performance problems (the XSL is quite complex and looks fancy with many images) If I use PNGs it takes 30s to create a PDF. If I use JPGs it takes only 2,5s to create the same PDF (JPGs crea