+0100
From: lmpmberna...@gmail.com
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: png vs. jpg
snip
Yes, there is a difference. By default FOP uses a native image
loader for JPG but not for PNG. There is however a native image loader
for PNG too, which you can enable in the configuration file
-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: png vs. jpg
snip
Yes, there is a difference. By default FOP uses a native image
loader for JPG but not for PNG. There is however a native image
loader for PNG too, which you can enable in the configuration
file
Ah, that makes sense then. I'm going to read the link that you referenced.
Thank you Luis.
-Roberto
From: Luis Bernardo [mailto:lmpmberna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:45 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: png vs. jpg
Yes, there is a difference
Yes, there is a difference. By default FOP uses a native image loader
for JPG but not for PNG. There is however a native image loader for PNG
too, which you can enable in the configuration file. See
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/ImageLoaderRawPNG for more
info. Try it and I
Hi Adam,
I think the cause of the 30sec delay is that PNGs aren't embedded
natively into the PDF and they must be transcoded first.
It would be really nice, if the FOP-Team could fix this issue, since
this problem also occurs when using PNGs inside SVGs and converting PNGs
to JPEGs isn't so
Hi Matthias,
Do zou know to which format are they trasformed?
Regards,
Ognjen
On 13.8.2010 14:37, Matthias Reischenbacher wrote:
Hi Adam,
I think the cause of the 30sec delay is that PNGs aren't embedded
natively into the PDF and they must be transcoded first.
It would be really nice, if
Matthias is right. The PNGs need to be decoded and re-encoded. Some time
ago I've made experiments to embed PNG files without re-encoding them
but I haven't gotten that to work. Somehow the data was not quite right
so Acrobat barked at me with its usual unhelpful error messages. :-( At
the moment
Jeremias,
do you have a patch file of your work with PNG? Perhaps with a second
pair of eyes we could resolve that issue... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
On 13.08.2010 12:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Matthias is right. The PNGs need to be decoded and re-encoded. Some time
ago I've made experiments to
