All done - lets see if my first patch gets approved! :-)
Thanks
Martin.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 9:41 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
Make sure you are working
Never mind - I see the link in the output.xml
-Original Message-
From: Martin Edge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 9:44 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: best format for high speed printing
No problem - will make the necessary adjustments and have
PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
Make sure you are working on the latest FOP Trunk (downloaded from the
SVN repository), then create a patch file using your favourite SVN
client. Or with the command-line client:
svn up
svn diff > /path
nt(pageDuplex));
> }
>
> Will give it a test and see how we go - I'm not familiar with the procedures
> and/or naming conventions with modifying Apache code.. what should I do? :)
>
> Thanks
> Martin.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Mae
not familiar with the procedures
and/or naming conventions with modifying Apache code.. what should I do? :)
Thanks
Martin.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 7:35 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format
-Original Message-
From: Martin Edge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 7:19 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: best format for high speed printing
Yeah - doing that now.. Sorry I meant to ask -
What if the combination of Letterhead v Plain Paper tr
uplexing I will have to test.. am downloading the FOP source
> now.. (not that I'm a java programmer ;))
>
> I really do appreciate your help by the way - in the last few days I have
> made heaps of progress thanks to your combined efforts -
>
> Thanks again,
> Martin.
&
.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
The tray selection extension just results in a command in PCL. If that
works with changing duplexing, I don't know. You'll have to do some
experiments.
On 02.06.2008 11:02:15 Martin Edge wrote:
> Would these extensions work
hould I see what is put in the intermediate format to define this and
> override it in there?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 6:45 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: best
@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
Tray selection is available:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/output.html#pcl-extensions
A Simplex/Duplex selection (ESC&l#S) extension hasn't been implemented,
yet, but should be easy to add if you take tray sel
wise I will just generate one PCL, split it and add each flag per PCL)
>
> Thanks
> Martin.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 4:44 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: best form
it and add each flag per PCL)
Thanks
Martin.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 2 June 2008 4:44 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
PCL is not very easy to post-process. It's possibl
PCL is not very easy to post-process. It's possible but probably tedious.
I'd use FOP's intermediate format [1] to add your barcodes and then
normally render the processed intermediate format using the PS or PCL
renderers.
[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/intermediate.html
On 01.06.200
: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 1 June 2008 5:00 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
Huh? You convert PDF to PCL? Why don't you use the PCL renderer? That
removes the seemingly time-consuming conversion from PDF to
On Jun 1, 2008, at 05:03, Martin Edge wrote:
Hi
Perhaps the software I am using to do the conversion from PDF to
PCL could be improved.. I tried postscript, but so far I have been
processing for 21hrs.. My 79Mb PDF file is now a 94 Gig Postscript
file! (that can’t be real, surely??).
De
June 2008 5:00 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
Huh? You convert PDF to PCL? Why don't you use the PCL renderer? That
removes the seemingly time-consuming conversion from PDF to PCL. Or
rather, if you can choose, I'd go for PostScri
nce to my desired printing type
> (PCL or PS).
>
> Like, maybe XSL -> FO -> SOMETHING -> PCL or XSL -> FO -> PCL?
>
> Thanks guys your help is most appreciated!
> Martin.
>
> ---
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 31 May 2008 11:11 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: best format for high speed printing
Is there an efficient file format available that is much faster, and still
allows me to control duplexing and tray selection
Is there an efficient file format available that is much faster, and still
allows me to control duplexing and tray selection per page?
Some high end printers have special markings and "language" (with
barcodes) that you can use outside the printing area to control the way
the printin
On 31.05.2008 08:14:11 Martin Edge wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Got a question - this may or may not be the best place to ask it.
>
> What's the best file format for production printing?
Depends in which part of the world you are in. Australia seems to be PCL
land. Europe is often PostScript land. An
Hey Guys,
Got a question - this may or may not be the best place to ask it.
What's the best file format for production printing?
My XSLT/XML/XSL-FO conversion process takes about an hour, but conversion to
PCL takes near on 12hrs (or more) and Postscript is looking very similar
with an astronom
21 matches
Mail list logo