Jason, after some tests I found out that this only fails with JDK 1.4.2
without any overridden endorsed libraries [1] in place. It doesn't
happen with an unpatched JDK 1.5.0_03, for example. I always use the
latest Xerces and Xalan version which is why I didn't stumble upon the
problem when I
Horrible! Here's what I found out:
It's Sun's fault. :-) Mostly, anyway.
I've recently changed FOP to use the JAXP/TRaX API (javax.transform) to
build (SVG) DOMs from a SAX stream. If Xalan-J is the primary XSLT
implementation, org.apache.xml.utils.DOMBuilder is used internally to
build the DOM.
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: fop trunk svg problems
Gesendet: Fr 24 Feb 2006 11:56:59 CET
Von: Jeremias Maerki[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horrible! Here's what I found out:
It's Sun's fault. :-) Mostly, anyway.
...so why is mine working? (The only difference is that I use blackdown
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: fop trunk svg problems
Gesendet: Fr 24 Feb 2006 07:42:20 CET
Von: Jason R Briggs[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I meant trunk as in HEAD (i.e. the latest code in subversion).
I know 'bout the difference of trunk and branch as well as the synonym meaning
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: fop trunk svg problems
Gesendet: Fr 24 Feb 2006 12:44:58 CET
Von: Chris Bowditch[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure I understand you. 0.20.5 is released from a Subversion
branch, whilst the new code 0.9x is released from Subversion head.
[...]
had
- original Nachricht
Betreff: fop trunk svg problems
Gesendet: Do 23 Feb 2006 20:44:55 CET
Von: Jason R Briggs[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else experiencing problems with SVG with the trunk version of fop?
nope (fop 0.20.5, batik 1.5.1, gentoo linux)
For example, the FO below
I meant trunk as in HEAD (i.e. the latest code in subversion).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- original Nachricht
Betreff: fop trunk svg problems
Gesendet: Do 23 Feb 2006 20:44:55 CET
Von: Jason R Briggs[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else experiencing problems with SVG with the trunk
