Thanks, Jeremias!
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
the reason for the problem is a vertical overflow in
the static-content.
Log output:
WARNING: static-content overflows the available
area. (fo:static-content, Header1, Header2)
It's always a good idea to look at
David,
the reason for the problem is a vertical overflow in the static-content.
Log output:
WARNING: static-content overflows the available area. (fo:static-content,
Header1, Header2)
It's always a good idea to look at warnings on the log even if they may
seem unrelated. You can also see now
Jeremias,
I think the three enclosed files demonstrate what I am
seeing. Please place them in the same directory and
run the following command:
fop -xml Test.xml -xsl Test.xsl -pdf Test.pdf
You will see the behavior that I described earlier (I
hope). Namely:
On Jun 8, 2006, at 20:17, David P. Nesbitt wrote:
Jeremias,
I think the three enclosed files demonstrate what I am
seeing. Please place them in the same directory and
run the following command:
fop -xml Test.xml -xsl Test.xsl -pdf Test.pdf
You will see the behavior that I described earlier
Hmm, I don't see the effect you describe. The snippet renders as I would
expect.
On 06.06.2006 04:38:52 David P. Nesbitt wrote:
The formatting of list-item has seemed to have changed
from 0.20.5 to 0.92. I have a list item (code
contained below) that is rending as follows in 0.92:
Jeremias,
Thanks for the assistance. Would it help if I
provided the generated PDF?
Regards,
Dave
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I don't see the effect you describe. The
snippet renders as I would
expect.
On 06.06.2006 04:38:52 David P. Nesbitt wrote:
The formatting
The formatting of list-item has seemed to have changed
from 0.20.5 to 0.92. I have a list item (code
contained below) that is rending as follows in 0.92:
-
|item-body (block 1)|
-
|item-label|
