There are two questionable assumptions you seem to make below:
(1) that FOP chooses (filters) metadata elements based on lang, i.e., FOP
implements the semantics of rdf:Alt;
(2) that FOP would fix-up non-conforming metadata;
Of course, the functionality in question is an extension to XSL-FO in
the following would not be valid XML, so would produce an XML parsing error
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Terence M. Bandoian tere...@tmbsw.comwrote:
Does it make sense to specify something like the following?
dc:title
rdf:Alt
rdf:li xml:lang=\x-default\An Orange in Flight/rdf:li
On 9/12/2011 6:20 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
the following would not be valid XML, so would produce an XML parsing
error
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Terence M. Bandoian
tere...@tmbsw.com mailto:tere...@tmbsw.com wrote:
Does it make sense to specify something like the following?
nope, just the backslashes are the problem
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Terence M. Bandoian tere...@tmbsw.comwrote:
On 9/12/2011 6:20 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
the following would not be valid XML, so would produce an XML parsing
error
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Terence M.
Dear all,
I am trying to fix a bug in fop debian package (#519592). I am
copying the exact bug report here (*). Does anyone knows what is going
on ? Should I simply fill in a bug report with this information ? The
aoif.fo attached allowed me to reproduce the issue with fop 1.0.
thanks
(*)
On 9/11/2011 7:31 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to fix a bug in fop debian package (#519592). I am
copying the exact bug report here (*). Does anyone knows what is going
on ? Should I simply fill in a bug report with this information ? The
aoif.fo attached allowed me to
