Re: FOP - Keeping blocks together

Andreia Oliveira wrote: Thanks Chris. I was hoping that I could solve my problem without migrating to a new Fop version. Can you please give me some instructions on the steps to perform this migration? From were it can be downloaded and what do I have to properly install it? Andreia, FOP

Using 20.5 and Trunk in same project?

Hi all, we've a project in which fop20.5 is already working for many year. now we wants to add some new features and are not sure if it is possible to use 20.5 and the trunk version in the same application. all jars are in the same classpath has someone some experience with this? we

Re: Using 20.5 and Trunk in same project?

Thanks for answer, so i'll have a look at it. Dirk Jeremias Maerki wrote: Yes, I do have experience with that. I've written a wrapper API for XSL-FO implementations [1] where I support exactly that: Support multiple FO implementations in the same VM. For that to work you have to isolate the

RE: Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

Here is a trimmed-down model of the XML. test-case-documents directory @name=dir-1 directory @name=dir-1-1 file nameTC_01/name .. More elements here .. /file /directory /directory test-case-documents This is the template in question: xsl:template

Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

This might be useful. It is a block of markup from the from the XSL-FO document produced by the template. fo:block text-align-last=justify fo:in-lineTC_01fo:leader leader-pattern=dots/ fo:page-number-citation ref-id=TC_01/ /fo:in-line /fo:block --

Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

On Mar 3, 2006, at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Charles / Jay, The quote below is from the fo:page-number-citation section of the recommendation. I find the construction id trait puzzling. It seems that the authors have gone out of their way to avoid the term attribute, Hmm...

Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

I'm back. Just when I thought it was safe to go back into the water (cue bass violin and muted trumpets); fop 0.20.5 is processing the XSL-FO document without complaint. I've still got some minor formatting issues to deal with, but I have one huge problem, no page numbers appear in the

RE: Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

As you can see from my trimmed-down data model. I have no id attribute. That issue is what I thought I was asking about when you replied: It is certainly true that the value of ref-id can be an element rather than an attribute. So it appears that I misunderstand the question of what has to be

Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

My bad, Charles. I was thinking of the input file rather than the FO when I responded to your initial question. Sorry about the confusion. I would add the id attribute to the block (or table or whatever) that contains the content of the source-document node you want to reference. So, if I had a

RE: Re: Help with table-of-contents:don't understand ref-id attribute

All is forgiven! I got everything worked out. There were a lot more warts on that toad than I thought, but I've knocked out every one. Thanks again. -- Charles Knell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email -Original Message- From: Jay Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:12:48