Hi, We have a large set of reports written with 0.20 version of FOP. We are
planning to upgrade then to .095 version. However at customer installation
there are custom reports files which we do not have access to so we did not
want to upgrade to jar file to .95 version. Will .95 version of
Is there tool or schema to validate report xsl files for a specific version
of FOP at development time. ?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Tool-or-schema-to-validate-report-xsl-files-tp32168625p32168625.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've used a free version of a tool from editix.com just to validate some
xsl syntax.
Eclipse Java editor can also edit xsl files.
FOP's web page lists which xslfo commands it supports.
FOP's input is the xslfo. It accepts xslt along with xml as a
convenience only. With embedded code this part
Hi Andreas and Rob,
Thank you very much both for your suggestions.
The idea of using space-before and start-indent attributes instead of top
and left respectively, and dropping the absolute position looks promising,
I'll try that. In fact there are 2 tables in the document, the main one
which we
2011/8/1 Eric Douglas edoug...@blockhouse.com:
I've used a free version of a tool from editix.com just to validate some
xsl syntax.
Eclipse Java editor can also edit xsl files.
FOP's web page lists which xslfo commands it supports.
FOP's input is the xslfo. It accepts xslt along with xml as
I use the open source Kernow program to test my files, it is really good for
both Schema and actually testing the transform as well.
Kindest regards
Theresa Forster
Senior Software Developer
-Original Message-
From: Eric Douglas [mailto:edoug...@blockhouse.com]
Sent: 01 August 2011
Could you please point me to these - unofficial xsd schema.
- There are several unofficial xsd for fo file too. Some tool provide
such fo schema...
Giuseppe Briotti-2 wrote:
2011/8/1 Eric Douglas edoug...@blockhouse.com:
I've used a free version of a tool from editix.com just to
Official xslfo keywords are on the official website: http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/
FOP supported xslfo keywords are on the FOP page:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html
You can read about xsd stuff on the official site also:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
Xsd is optional. I don't
Some of them are provided by the tool author (Oxygen, FOP, Renderx
provide a XML Schema or DTD for FO files).
Take a look at fo page at FOP: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/fo.html
section Validating XSL-FO
2011/8/1 vjintegrates vijaypawnar...@gmail.com:
Could you please point me to these -
If you can deduce at run-time which users/reports need 0.20 v. 0.95 then
you can invoke the correct library as necessary with classpath
manipulation, but I doubt you'll have much luck running in mixed mode.
On 08/01/2011 04:34 AM, vjintegrates wrote:
Hi, We have a large set of reports written
Thanks for the further update. In general, you should not be using font
metric files with FOP 1.0 or later.
Regarding Arial, Times New Roman, and Courier New fonts, I have not
explicitly tested these for Arabic support, but I will look into it. Keep in
mind that the Complex Script support
11 matches
Mail list logo