You have to do things like that in XSLT. Something like
xsl:if test=@regnum != preceding-sibling::*/@regnum
fo:blockxsl:value-of select=@regnum//fo:block
/xsl:if
(really depends on what your XML looks like)
HTH
On 02.04.2008 09:36:33 adupper wrote:
Is there a function or workaround to do
The class is called FopFactory, not FOPFactory but I don't think
that's the problem. I have no idea about this xFormsManager. Maybe the
FOP JARs are simply missing somehow. I simply can't tell from here.
Maybe you need to ask xFormsManager support about how they integrated
FOP.
On 02.04.2008
On 02.04.2008 18:56:50 Louis.Masters wrote:
My table height has stopped working after I upgraded to 0.94. My previous
code was:
fo:table table-layout=fixed width=100% height.minimum=45mm
border=1pt solid red
I tried:
fo:table table-layout=fixed width=100%
You obviously missed the announcement of 0.95beta. Please try it out.
On 03.04.2008 07:56:23 Harshini Madurapperuma wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
I was working with Bitmap processing and the FOP version 0.94 doesn't
support 16 bit bitmaps. Then You said the newer version FOP Trunk (
0.95) will
Hi,
I am using the embeded examples in a Netbean IDE to render XML to PDF. is
there a way to have two check boxes to give me the options to output, or do
not output graphics and or foldouts in the PDF.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I am hoping if someone can provide some guidance on fox:continued-label in
FOP 0.94. Is this supported? If not what is the possible work arounds?
Thanks for the guidance.
Bones
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/fox%3Acontinued-label-tp16468084p16468084.html
Sent
bonekrusher wrote:
Hi,
I am hoping if someone can provide some guidance on fox:continued-label in
FOP 0.94. Is this supported? If not what is the possible work arounds?
Thanks for the guidance.
Bones
Answer, according to this page:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/extensions.html,
On Apr 3, 2008, at 22:45, Kamal Bhatt wrote:
bonekrusher wrote:
Hi,
I am hoping if someone can provide some guidance on fox:continued-
label in
FOP 0.94. Is this supported? If not what is the possible work
arounds?
Thanks for the guidance.
Bones
Answer, according to this page:
nancy_b wrote:
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
nancy_b nancy_brndt at yahoo.com writes:
snip
I need some customization that says:
if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width...
Hello nancy_b,
Did you