Re: Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env.
Did you give the JVM for the entreprise environment enough memory to work with? Such a slowdown is likely produced by the garbage collector of Java or by the operating system constantly swapping memory in and out. On 24.03.2006 22:47:27 Ganji, Jithendra wrote: Hi Chris, We are working SunOS5.8 operating system and JVM 1.4.X. We are not having any SVG in document. Thanks for your suggestion on to use latest version of FOP. But we are already in production, so we can not upgrade imm. Wev have to work on current Fop version i.e 0.20.5 One strange observation when I generated PDF( of 27 pages) as standalone application on the same SunOS5.8 env by using below mentioned command it is taking just 1500 ms. Where as generating thru enterprise application in windows it took 500 ms(approx),* where as in UNIX(SunOS5.8)*** 43587ms (approx).* java -cp fop.jar:xml-apis.jar:avalon-framework-cvs-20020806.jar:xercesImpl.jar:xa lan.jar:batik.jar org.apache.fop.apps.Fop -c foconf/fopconfig.xml -fo test.fo -pdf test.pdf Any pointers from this will be appreciated. Thanks, Ganji -Original Message- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:42 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env. Ganji, Jithendra wrote: Hi, We are using FOP 0.20.5 for PDF conversion. We registered Courier New custom font by following the steps given at _http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.20.5/fonts.html#custom_ We generated appropriate font metrics file(cour.xml) for cour.ttf file using TTFReader on different operating systems(Windows and UNIX) based on their usage. The performance of generating PDF in Windows env is excellent, but in UNIX environment it is very bad. For 27 pages document in windows it is taking*** 500 ms(approx),* where as in UNIX( Solaris)*** 43587ms (approx).* *This is a major hit for us in using FOP. We need a solution ASAP.* This is strange indeed, what JVM do you use on Linux? Does the Linux environment have an X windows server? Does your document have any SVG? FOP 0.20.5 is no longer actively maintained so you're not likely to get much of a response I think. My recommendation would be to try FOP 0.91beta and see if the problem persists. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env.
Ganji, Jithendra wrote: Hi, We are using FOP 0.20.5 for PDF conversion. We registered “Courier New” custom font by following the steps given at _http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.20.5/fonts.html#custom_ We generated appropriate font metrics file(cour.xml) for cour.ttf file using TTFReader on different operating systems(Windows and UNIX) based on their usage. The performance of generating PDF in Windows env is excellent, but in UNIX environment it is very bad. For 27 pages document in windows it is taking*** 500 ms(approx),* where as in UNIX( Solaris)*** 43587ms (approx).* *This is a major hit for us in using FOP. We need a solution ASAP.* This is strange indeed, what JVM do you use on Linux? Does the Linux environment have an X windows server? Does your document have any SVG? FOP 0.20.5 is no longer actively maintained so you're not likely to get much of a response I think. My recommendation would be to try FOP 0.91beta and see if the problem persists. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env.
Hi Chris, We are working SunOS5.8 operating system and JVM 1.4.X. We are not having any SVG in document. Thanks for your suggestion on to use latest version of FOP. But we are already in production, so we can not upgrade imm. Wev have to work on current Fop version i.e 0.20.5 One strange observation when I generated PDF( of 27 pages) as standalone application on the same SunOS5.8 env by using below mentioned command it is taking just 1500 ms. Where as generating thru enterprise application in windows it took 500 ms(approx),* where as in UNIX(SunOS5.8)*** 43587ms (approx).* java -cp fop.jar:xml-apis.jar:avalon-framework-cvs-20020806.jar:xercesImpl.jar:xa lan.jar:batik.jar org.apache.fop.apps.Fop -c foconf/fopconfig.xml -fo test.fo -pdf test.pdf Any pointers from this will be appreciated. Thanks, Ganji -Original Message- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:42 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env. Ganji, Jithendra wrote: Hi, We are using FOP 0.20.5 for PDF conversion. We registered Courier New custom font by following the steps given at _http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.20.5/fonts.html#custom_ We generated appropriate font metrics file(cour.xml) for cour.ttf file using TTFReader on different operating systems(Windows and UNIX) based on their usage. The performance of generating PDF in Windows env is excellent, but in UNIX environment it is very bad. For 27 pages document in windows it is taking*** 500 ms(approx),* where as in UNIX( Solaris)*** 43587ms (approx).* *This is a major hit for us in using FOP. We need a solution ASAP.* This is strange indeed, what JVM do you use on Linux? Does the Linux environment have an X windows server? Does your document have any SVG? FOP 0.20.5 is no longer actively maintained so you're not likely to get much of a response I think. My recommendation would be to try FOP 0.91beta and see if the problem persists. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env.
Title: Performance issue in generating PDFs for Custom Fonts in UNIX env. Hi, We are using FOP 0.20.5 for PDF conversion. We registered Courier New custom font by following the steps given at http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.20.5/fonts.html#custom We generated appropriate font metrics file(cour.xml) for cour.ttf file using TTFReader on different operating systems(Windows and UNIX) based on their usage. The performance of generating PDF in Windows env is excellent, but in UNIX environment it is very bad. For 27 pages document in windows it is taking 500 ms(approx), where as in UNIX( Solaris) 43587ms (approx). This is a major hit for us in using FOP. We need a solution ASAP. Have you ever faced such problem with FOP? Your suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Here is the log taken from UNIX environment. --- 17:30:29,492 INFO FOP - Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser 17:30:29,493 INFO Driver - building formatting object tree 17:30:29,493 INFO FOP - setting up fonts 17:30:29,528 INFO Driver - [1] 17:30:29,533 INFO FOP - Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser 17:30:30,714 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:30,717 INFO Driver - [2] 17:30:32,522 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:32,525 INFO Driver - [3] 17:30:34,424 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:34,427 INFO Driver - [4] 17:30:36,418 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:36,422 INFO Driver - [5] 17:30:38,060 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:38,062 INFO Driver - [6] 17:30:39,384 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:39,387 INFO Driver - [7] 17:30:41,190 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:41,193 INFO Driver - [8] 17:30:42,963 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:42,967 INFO Driver - [9] 17:30:44,895 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:44,898 INFO Driver - [10] 17:30:46,886 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:46,889 INFO Driver - [11] 17:30:48,769 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:48,772 INFO Driver - [12] 17:30:50,647 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:50,650 INFO Driver - [13] 17:30:52,481 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:52,484 INFO Driver - [14] 17:30:54,052 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:54,055 INFO Driver - [15] 17:30:56,036 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:56,039 INFO Driver - [16] 17:30:57,995 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:57,998 INFO Driver - [17] 17:30:59,381 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:30:59,384 INFO Driver - [18] 17:31:00,792 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:00,795 INFO Driver - [19] 17:31:02,672 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:02,675 INFO Driver - [20] 17:31:04,609 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:04,612 INFO Driver - [21] 17:31:06,393 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:06,396 INFO Driver - [22] 17:31:07,987 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:07,990 INFO Driver - [23] 17:31:09,494 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:09,496 INFO Driver - [24] 17:31:10,336 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:10,339 INFO Driver - [25] 17:31:10,858 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:10,861 INFO Driver - [26] 17:31:11,966 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:11,968 INFO Driver - [27] 17:31:13,005 DEBUG Driver - Last page-sequence produced 1 pages. 17:31:13,006 INFO Driver - Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer 17:31:13,079 DEBUG Driver - Initial heap size: 27296Kb 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - Current heap size: 36756Kb 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - Total memory used: 9459Kb 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - Memory use is indicative; no GC was performed 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - These figures should not be used comparatively 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - Total time used: 43587ms 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - Pages rendered: 27 17:31:13,080 DEBUG Driver - Avg render time: 1614ms/page Thanks in advance, Ganji
