RE: Logging per generation process

2007-03-01 Thread Raphael Parree
Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2007 16:19 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Logging per generation process Hi Raphael If that works for you that's great. A ThreadLocal is certainly a possibility especially as long as we don't do multi-threaded processing

Re: Logging per generation process

2007-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Raphael If that works for you that's great. A ThreadLocal is certainly a possibility especially as long as we don't do multi-threaded processing. However, my ideas go in a different direction as described on the Wiki. The important thing for me is to differentiate between feedback for

RE: Re: Logging per generation process

2007-02-21 Thread Raphael Parree
Jeremias, I replying a bit late (this reply is to an email dating back to November last year) see messages below. I have solved it using a ThreadLocal object and a custom log4j Appender, which might be something that leads to an easy solution. It worked for me, but don't know how to make

Logging per generation process

2006-11-27 Thread Raphael Parree
Hi, What is the status on We are planning to add an additional feedback facility to FOP which can be used to obtain all sorts of specific feedback (validation messages, layout problems etc.)!? I need per generation process logging...if the above has not been implemented is there a way of

Re: Logging per generation process

2006-11-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The status is the same as when I wrote that text. At some point this will be done but at this time it's only on my wish list. My notes on the issue are on the Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback See also: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ApiRequirements You're