Now I am starting to understand. For my job the road
to be followed is the great use of the tables (even if it seems me more
uncomfortable).
I have tried to remove the block-containers from the
region body leaving them (for the moment) only in region header. Finally it
goes on more
On 10.02.2006 19:31:12 Moreschi Lucio wrote:
> Now I am a little worried
You should be. You invested a lot of work in the wrong direction and
used XSL-FO like it were a desktop publishing system. But it's not.
> I have used the block-containers because a good method for job seemed me
> (type C
Moreschi Lucio wrote:
Hi all,
I am using FOP 0.20.5 in order to create PDF documents ( for example
invoices) I have this problem:
When the line number of my document is higher than the one that can be
included in the page of PDF document, Apache doesn’t change page and
the remaining
Question back: Why do you want to use block-container? Why can't you
just leave the fo:table as a direct child of fo:flow or of an fo:block?
Look at the XSL-FO specification, chapter 7.5.1, the "absolute-position"
property: "Absolutely positioned areas are taken out of the normal flow.
This means
Hi all,
I am using FOP 0.20.5 in order to create PDF
documents ( for example invoices) I have this problem:
When the line number of my document is higher than
the one that can be included in the page of PDF document, Apache
doesn’t change page and the remaining lines are not shown