If someone is interested,
i solve my problem changing version of apache fop from 0.94 to 0.20.5.
altmax wrote:
Hello,
i have a problem with apache fop 0.94.
My os is windows xp , my application server oracle 9ias oc4j1.0.2.2.1,
jdk1.3.1_09 with jre 1.3.1_09.
Class java is:
Hello,
i have a problem with apache fop 0.94.
My os is windows xp , my application server oracle 9ias oc4j1.0.2.2.1,
jdk1.3.1_09 with jre 1.3.1_09.
Class java is:
.
import
..
public class
Not without the FO file to reproduce the problem, no. You can do some
more testing yourself by running the same document on the command-line.
It's probably a good idea to do such a test outside the Oracle server to
make sure it's not something from Oracle interfering here. The Oracle
server caused
Sure oracle interfering with fop, but can i use it with this application
server??
Where can i find this FO file??
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
Not without the FO file to reproduce the problem, no. You can do some
more testing yourself by running the same document on the command-line.
It's
Yes, it's possible to use FOP inside Oracle, but if you run into
certain problems (the one at hand is not normally one of them) you may
need to replace the XML support bundled with Oracle with Apache
Xerces/Xalan in order to avoid possible bugs in Oracle code. Please see
the mailing list archives
hi,
the FO file is as follows:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
fo:layout-master-set
fo:simple-page-master margin-right=2cm margin-left=2cm
margin-bottom=2cm margin-top=2cm page-width=21cm page-height=29.7cm
master-name=simpleA4
fo:region-body/
Bull I just remembered that we've had this before:
http://fop-users.markmail.org/search/?q=PDFNumber+not+empty
Back then it was suggested that it could be a multi-threading problem
but looking at what the exception raises tells me it has nothing to do
with the (still unsolved) issue with
Already I read the previous mail, but i didn't solve my problem :(
So I do not hope to use Apache FOP with Oracle 9ias
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
Bull I just remembered that we've had this before:
http://fop-users.markmail.org/search/?q=PDFNumber+not+empty
Back then it was suggested
