Re: [foreman-dev] Regular Foreman-core issue triage?

It would be interesting to try giving this a try, I think right now we don't much insight into new issues raised and no prioritization of them. Previously Dominic used to do at least a minimal triage on all incoming issues, but right now I don't think anyone does that. One concern though is the

Re: [foreman-dev] Re: [UX] Facets and Host UI - roadmap discussion.

I think these screenshots illustrate that pure option 2 can have negative impact on usability. If I'm a puppet user, the puppet environment is one of the most important thing to set. Having it in last tab completely separate from hostgroup does not feel right. If some field of facet is part of

[foreman-dev] Request to add Fedora 27 to Koji

Hi, With the release of Fedora 27 today, pulp has a need to add Fedora 27 support for pulp's upcoming 2.15.0 release, if possible. While the transition to copr is on the table for pulp, we don't anticipate completion before 2.15.0 goes out. With that, is it possible to get Fedora 27 repos

Re: [foreman-dev] Regular Foreman-core issue triage?

Bump - any thoughts here from the -dev community? Simple +1 or -1 or even a +0 for indifference would be great to just know where folks stand and whether this would be worth while. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Eric D Helms wrote: > Writing this up inspired me to capture

Re: [foreman-dev] Re: [UX] Facets and Host UI - roadmap discussion.

Thanks for the screenshots! I like that the information is grouped together. I think that this could easily be integrated into the host designs that were done. On Sunday, November 12, 2017 at 1:36:08 PM UTC-5, ssh...@redhat.com wrote: > > > OK, I have managed to create some screenshots of the