On 04/05/17 17:22, Sean O'Keeffe wrote:
> *I think I'll redo this as the following unless anyone has any
> objections..* I know we don't really want to include another join but i
> don't see any other way to cater for LoadBalanced & Multi-homed Smart
> Proxies.
>
> - A new SmartProxyHostname mode
@sshtein I think requiring defined subnets would be a bad idea, for example
if you're using foreman_discovery you don't need to define subnets at all.
Also storing a hostname in the smart_proxies table is kind of weird IMO,
having an attribute to indicate that its actually a hostname of this proxy
I can't speak to the technical aspects here, but I don't have a problem
with the grouping you showed in the PR for the dropdown. That said, you
mentioned potentially listing by Hostname or Name attribute, I would ask -
what method would a user be most familiar with? I took a look in the demo
en
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <
ew...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:44:51PM +, Sean O'Keeffe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <
> > ew...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 20, 201
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:44:51PM +, Sean O'Keeffe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <
> ew...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:50:30PM +, Sean O'Keeffe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <
ew...@kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:50:30PM +, Sean O'Keeffe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > > Can you elaborate more on motivation? Multi-homed proxy is still one
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:50:30PM +, Sean O'Keeffe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > Can you elaborate more on motivation? Multi-homed proxy is still one
> > instance, why would
> > Foreman need to reach to it in two different ways?
>
> This is for clients t
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hey,
>
Howdy :-)
>
> I can't remember recommending such a big change :-)
Sorry I meant about tagging the email with [RFE]
> Can you elaborate more on motivation? Multi-homed proxy is still one
> instance, why would
> Foreman need to rea
Hey,
I can't remember recommending such a big change :-) Can you elaborate
more on motivation? Multi-homed proxy is still one instance, why would
Foreman need to reach to it in two different ways? Isn't the result
always the same (a change on the same instance)? How about relaxing
the constraing w
Hey!
So lzap suggested this.. lets see how it goes :-)
*I'm looking to solve the following issues*
- I would like to have a multi-homed proxy.
- I would like clients to connect to a Proxy when there is a NAT between.
My approach has been for proxies to have multiple URLs and during
provisioning
10 matches
Mail list logo
