Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Fedora 24 packages

+1 on dropping F24 but I'm unsure about dropping Fedora altogether. On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Eric D Helms wrote: I went ahead an opened a PR to remove this in preparation [1]. We don't have any official policies that I can think of for how long to let this discussion sit before

Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Fedora 24 packages

I went ahead an opened a PR to remove this in preparation [1]. We don't have any official policies that I can think of for how long to let this discussion sit before pulling the trigger. As ewoud points out, we should split the "dropping Fedora all together" into its own discussion. I think this

Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Fedora 24 packages

This gets a +1 from me due to the fact that Fedora 24 is now no longer in support mode and the low percentage of users using Fedora in general. This would reduce our overall overhead of support. Eric On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Greg Sutcliffe wrote: > Forgot to

Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Fedora 24 packages

Forgot to add a link: https://theforeman.org/2017/03/2017-foreman-survey-analysis.html#page1 Page down to the first table (not pie chart) in that section. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Fedora 24 packages

Since Katello does not have builds for Fedora and it's extra work and I believe not many users use such an old Fedora systems for productions (there's CentOS of course), I am all for dropping it completely. We are loosing the flexibility of being "on track" with what's next for CentOS on the other