On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:32:02PM +0100, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:50:14 BST Marek Hulán wrote:
> > > While I agree that we need a better way to end discussions, I think that
> > > on point 1 we can improve as well. To me it feels like we lack
> > > visibility. It has be
On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 12:50:14 BST Marek Hulán wrote:
> > While I agree that we need a better way to end discussions, I think that
> > on point 1 we can improve as well. To me it feels like we lack
> > visibility. It has been suggested to move back to the mailing list since
> > that has more vi
On úterý 28. března 2017 13:38:31 CEST Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:39:45PM +, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
> > I've been meaning to reply to this for about a week, sorry for the delay.
> > This is a topic I've been thinking about for a *long* time, so apologies
> > f
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:39:45PM +, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
> I've been meaning to reply to this for about a week, sorry for the delay.
> This
> is a topic I've been thinking about for a *long* time, so apologies for the
> long thread :P
Let me be even later to the party.
> I think there's
I find email (properly tagged) more comfortable than github or wiki,
but I can live with current status if folks prefer. So you can bucket
me in "keep as is".
LZ
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Greg Sutcliffe
wrote:
> I've been meaning to reply to this for about a week, sorry for the delay. Thi
I've been meaning to reply to this for about a week, sorry for the delay. This
is a topic I've been thinking about for a *long* time, so apologies for the
long thread :P
I think there's two issues here. One is *how* to have the discussion, and the
other is how to *end* the discussion. From the
I also have not made a contribution to the RFC repo, but from time to time
have read others. I like the idea of the RFC repo, but wonder if it could
be better organized.
One frustration I have with it is it is if you want to get a full idea of
new and upcoming ideas, you have to browse each indivi
I have an open design in the RFC repo that contains screenshots and
feedback that I still plan to implement. I've kept it open due to some
refactoring that has to happen before it can be implemented.
I like having a central place that I can design out a feature with other
developers and UX team. I
I also like the RFC repository. I have not merged or closed a lot of my
RFCs because I consider the designs to still be open discussions that need
re-visting and continued visibility. The ability to comment on specific
issues and have multiple threads going makes it much easier to follow than
a mai
On 03/13/2017 07:10 AM, Tomas Strachota wrote:
For me the biggest advantage of RFC repo over design discussions on
mailing list is that when you come back to it later, you immediately
see the latest state of the proposal without any need for reading
through the whole email thread. At the same t
On 03/13, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> >some design decisions are still being made without going through the RFC
> >process, either by mailing list discussions or by people just creating PRs
> >without any prior discussion.
>
> I've seen this several times particularly in Smart Proxy repo where
> some
For me the biggest advantage of RFC repo over design discussions on
mailing list is that when you come back to it later, you immediately
see the latest state of the proposal without any need for reading
through the whole email thread. At the same time, when you what to see
the whole discussion you
On pondělí 13. března 2017 9:44:12 CET Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> >some design decisions are still being made without going through the RFC
> >process, either by mailing list discussions or by people just creating PRs
> >without any prior discussion.
> I've seen this several times particularly in Smar
>some design decisions are still being made without going through the RFC
>process, either by mailing list discussions or by people just creating PRs
>without any prior discussion.
I've seen this several times particularly in Smart Proxy repo where
some design changes were part of regular PRs wi
Hello,
About a year ago, we decided to try using a new system for discussing
design decisions prior to making changes, by creating a repo for RFCs [1].
Part of the problem was that when discussing on the mailing list,
discussions tended to die out without a resolution, and eventually whoever
wrote
15 matches
Mail list logo
