Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift

2016-05-26 Thread Stephen Benjamin
- Original Message - > From: "Dominic Cleal" <domi...@cleal.org> > To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:42:33 AM > Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift > > On 25/05/16 17:25, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaard

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift

2016-05-26 Thread Dominic Cleal
On 25/05/16 17:25, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Stephen Benjamin wrote: >> I can understand separating it from development tools, so what about moving >> Katello's bats to foreman-bats? > > What would then be the primary way of getting the latest

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift

2016-05-25 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Stephen Benjamin wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dominic Cleal" <domi...@cleal.org> > > To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com > > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:29:41 AM > > Subject: R

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift

2016-05-25 Thread Stephen Benjamin
- Original Message - > From: "Dominic Cleal" <domi...@cleal.org> > To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:29:41 AM > Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift > > On 23/05/16 21:48, Ewoud Kohl va

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift

2016-05-25 Thread Dominic Cleal
On 23/05/16 21:48, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > Hello all, > > With katello-deploy being renamed to Forklift[1], I was wondering if we > should merge foreman-bats into it. The benefit would be that it already > contains some bats tests for Katello and if it's going to be the tool to >

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift

2016-05-24 Thread David Davis
Yes, Forklift can deploy just foreman: https://git.io/vroKn David On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > Thoughts? > > Is it possible to use katello-deploy for deployment of plain Foreman? If > not, are there plans to do so? If not, it does not make much