- Original Message -
> From: "Dominic Cleal" <domi...@cleal.org>
> To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:42:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift
>
> On 25/05/16 17:25, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaard
On 25/05/16 17:25, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Stephen Benjamin wrote:
>> I can understand separating it from development tools, so what about moving
>> Katello's bats to foreman-bats?
>
> What would then be the primary way of getting the latest
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Stephen Benjamin wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dominic Cleal" <domi...@cleal.org>
> > To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:29:41 AM
> > Subject: R
- Original Message -
> From: "Dominic Cleal" <domi...@cleal.org>
> To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:29:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Merge foreman-bats into Forklift
>
> On 23/05/16 21:48, Ewoud Kohl va
On 23/05/16 21:48, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> With katello-deploy being renamed to Forklift[1], I was wondering if we
> should merge foreman-bats into it. The benefit would be that it already
> contains some bats tests for Katello and if it's going to be the tool to
>
Yes, Forklift can deploy just foreman: https://git.io/vroKn
David
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> Is it possible to use katello-deploy for deployment of plain Foreman? If
> not, are there plans to do so? If not, it does not make much