Re: [foreman-users] Re: Foreman plugin dependency problem with "deface".

On 22 November 2016 at 08:29, Doug Scoular wrote: > Hi Greg, > > That helps heaps! > > I'm curious as to why the "production" 1.12 machine which uses a remote > puppet CA, puppet Compile Master and DB didn't already have a dependency on > "deface". I guess maybe the

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Foreman plugin dependency problem with "deface".

Hi Greg, That helps heaps! I'm curious as to why the "production" 1.12 machine which uses a remote puppet CA, puppet Compile Master and DB didn't already have a dependency on "deface". I guess maybe the foreman_setup plugin doesn't use it. Anyway, I'm now furiously trying to learn ruby so I can

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Foreman plugin dependency problem with "deface".

Glad you got it working! For reference, here's a few things to know ;) 1) It's generally not recommended to do development stuff on a production server, since (as you've found out) it's remarkably tricky to get the SCL dependencies right. As you've seen, it can be done, but it's probably better