Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

2016-11-09 Thread Ross Berteig
On 11/9/2016 1:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: The existing download works great on the vast majority of Linuxdesktops. For the small minority where it doesn't work, "./configure;make" is an easy alternative. I think at least part of the issue is that the download is described as "Linux 3.x x86"

Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

2016-11-09 Thread K. Fossil user
Hi, 1/ Thank you Artur Shepilko !In fact, I've noticed that issue and others issues in the past that I suppose are fixed (say glitches at this time), but I do prefer to wait for a 1.37 rock solid software.Not to mention that I've said that a 1.36.1 should be done for a better software.This

Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

2016-11-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On 11/9/16, Artur Shepilko wrote: > > Seriously, guys, The existing download works great on the vast majority of Linux desktops. For the small minority where it doesn't work, "./configure; make" is an easy alternative. Where does one draw the line? If we have separate

[fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

2016-11-09 Thread Artur Shepilko
Re: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg24316.html Seriously, guys, this is currently the most-recent version. This may be confusing to any new user who'd try d/l fossil binary for Linux. Ironically this may work when the user's system is 64-bit, still some may give