Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

On 11/9/2016 1:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: The existing download works great on the vast majority of Linuxdesktops. For the small minority where it doesn't work, "./configure;make" is an easy alternative. I think at least part of the issue is that the download is described as "Linux 3.x x86"

Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

b scheduler in Unix-like computer operating systems. »   Best Regards K. De : Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> À : fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org Envoyé le : Mercredi 9 novembre 2016 21h44 Objet : Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs.

Re: [fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

On 11/9/16, Artur Shepilko wrote: > > Seriously, guys, The existing download works great on the vast majority of Linux desktops. For the small minority where it doesn't work, "./configure; make" is an easy alternative. Where does one draw the line? If we have separate

[fossil-dev] download page: Linux x86 inconsistent fossil binary (64bit vs. 32bit)

Re: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg24316.html Seriously, guys, this is currently the most-recent version. This may be confusing to any new user who'd try d/l fossil binary for Linux. Ironically this may work when the user's system is 64-bit, still some may give