On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Joshua Paine wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 17:53 -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>> Seems like I fixed this bug a few weeks ago. What version of Fossil
>> are you using?
>
> [02f638a16f] 2010-02-13 12:30:48 UTC
>
> Should I be good with the 3/8 snapshot on fossil-scm.
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 17:53 -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> Seems like I fixed this bug a few weeks ago. What version of Fossil
> are you using?
[02f638a16f] 2010-02-13 12:30:48 UTC
Should I be good with the 3/8 snapshot on fossil-scm.org?
--
Joshua Paine
LetterBlock: Web applications buil
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Joshua Paine wrote:
> It seems like adding the images directories as I described in my last
> was a bad idea. Besides the unbearable slowness, it doesn't seem to
> be a
> prudent model if the 'others' aren't going to keep fossil up to date
> on
> the image changes
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Joshua Paine wrote:
> So, I had a fossil repo for a web app that has a lot of hands in it.
> I'm
> the only code developer (though not the first by many years--repo
> converted from CVS), but the application serves hundreds of clients,
> and
> images and other suc
It seems like adding the images directories as I described in my last
was a bad idea. Besides the unbearable slowness, it doesn't seem to be a
prudent model if the 'others' aren't going to keep fossil up to date on
the image changes. (They aren't. And with commits taking minutes, I
couldn't possibl
So, I had a fossil repo for a web app that has a lot of hands in it. I'm
the only code developer (though not the first by many years--repo
converted from CVS), but the application serves hundreds of clients, and
images and other such customizations for each client are done by others.
The directory
On 3/16/2010 8:39 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> fossil setting ignore-glob
>
>
BTW... Thank you for this change! This has always been the most annoying
thing for me when using fossil. It's a great addition. Thanks again!
Jeremy
___
fossil-use
On 3/16/2010 8:39 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> fossil setting ignore-glob
MinGW's bash must be expanding the asterisk for some reason:
$ fossil setting ignore-glob 'build/*'
Usage: c:\Development\Tools\Fossil\fossil.exe setting ?PROPERTY? ?VALUE?
However:
$ fossil setting ignore-glob 'build/*,*
On Mar 16, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
>
> Also, once this problem is fixed, does it make sense to store this
> option in the database? Maybe in the Behavior section of the setup
> web page?
>
fossil setting ignore-glob
D. Richard Hipp
d...@hwaci.com
___
Hm, weird. It works under cmd.exe, but not the MinGW bash shell.
$ fossil extras --ignore 'build/*'
CHANGES.txt
build/VERSION.h
build/add.o
build/add_.c
build/allrepo.h
build/allrepo.o
build/allrepo_.c
I couldn't come up with any combination to make that work. The shell is
bash, I am assuming t
On Mar 16, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> For my fossil checkout, I do: mkdir build && cd build && make -f ../
> Makefile
>
> So, from my root fossil directory, I do fossil extras --ignore build
> but
> still wind up with everything under the build directory.
fossil extra --ig
For my fossil checkout, I do: mkdir build && cd build && make -f ../Makefile
So, from my root fossil directory, I do fossil extras --ignore build but
still wind up with everything under the build directory. I can do
--ignore *.o and get rid of the .o files in the build directory but it
still sh
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 21:55 -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
> >
> > I find that my users frequently want to attach one or more artefact
> > to a ticket. These artefacts may be test cases, supporting
> > documentation, snippets of program output, wh
13 matches
Mail list logo
