[fossil-users] Eclipse IDE

2011-01-21 Thread paolo lulli
Hi, I thought I heard somebody long ago working on an Eclipse plugin for Fossil. Anybody knows ? Regards, Paolo Lulli ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] ignore list

2011-01-21 Thread Gour
On Tue, 25 May 2010 08:43:22 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: See the ignore-glob setting. Coming from other DVCS (darcs, bzr..) I am accustomed to have kind of 'default' ignore-glob list catching most often used file suffixes. What do you think about providing some 'default' list so

Re: [fossil-users] Diff highlighting

2011-01-21 Thread Rene
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:29:40 +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: Hello, I've made a tiny simple diff highlighting for Fossil (well, technically, for any HTML page) in JavaScript, and thought I'd share it with you. Just put the following somewhere into Footer (not header!) above /body:

Re: [fossil-users] Diff highlighting

2011-01-21 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Rene wrote: You could define every thing in the head and do body th1 if { fdiff eq $current_page || otherdiffed page eq $current_page } { html onload='DiffHighlighter.highlightElementsWithTagName(\'pre\')' } /th1 This would have the

Re: [fossil-users] Diff highlighting

2011-01-21 Thread Rene
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:44:47 +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Rene wrote: You could define every thing in the head and do body th1 if { fdiff eq $current_page || otherdiffed page eq $current_page } { html

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Francisc Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.01.2011 13:45, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Francisc Simon francisc.si...@evalgo.comwrote: Hi @all, i probably ask a question that was already asked before but i can not figure out from the

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Francisc Simon francisc.si...@evalgo.comwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The only way, in Windows, that you can have a process started by a user continue running after logoff (i.e. what nohup does) is to start it either through a

[fossil-users] Fossil status icons in TextMate

2011-01-21 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
Hello, I've added Fossil support to ProjectPlus plugin for TextMate (it shows added/deleted/etc icons for files in the project drawer). I've send pull request to the author, so I hope it will be included in the next release of the plugin. For now, the source code is here:

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Why not use threads? Perhaps you said this because you are aware of my opinion of threads and you just wanted to push my buttons? Ha! I'm on to your ruse and it won't work! Multi-threaded processes are supported on

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Nolan Darilek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2011 07:44 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: will be appreciated. Though, I suppose I could make these things a posix-only feature. That would be my vote, if in fact you are interested in taking votes. :) No sense in *everyone* missing out

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: But I did not accept that branch onto the trunk. I want to do the hooks via a different mechanism. But in order to implement this different mechanism, I need example C code for launching a background process in windows that is not

Re: [fossil-users] is there a push/sync/commit hook for unit testing ?

2011-01-21 Thread Francisc Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.01.2011 21:36, Nolan Darilek wrote: On 01/21/2011 07:44 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: will be appreciated. Though, I suppose I could make these things a posix-only feature. That would be my vote, if in fact you are interested in taking