On Feb 27, 2011 5:53am, Timothy Brown javelin...@yahoo.com wrote:
For your consideration,
How hard would it be to build Fossil for Android? For that matter how
hard would it be to get Fossil built for iOS?
With all these Android tablets about to burst on the scene it would be
nice to be
There have been a lot of changes to the Fossil sources over the past week.
If you are able, please compile the latest Fossil from sources and give it a
try. Let me know if you encounter any problems.
Note: Trying a beta of Fossil is not nearly as risky as it sounds. You
are very unlikely to
To make it more in line with current fossil behavior, perhaps scrub
--private should mark private branches for deletion and rebuild
should delete them if there are any, just like shunned artifacts ?
(and undo should revert those if executed prior to rebuild)
Stanislav Paskalev
On Mon, Feb 28,
Easy fix while people think of real answers: map a drive letter to \\server\path
--
Will Owen West
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:15, Christian Busch busch.christ...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello user group,
I have an issue with unc pathes on a windows machine.
My fossil version is: This is fossil
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
New user dumb question.
Fossil Documentation:
By default, everything you check into a Fossil repository is shared
to all clones of that repository. In Fossil, you don't push and pull
individual branches; you push and pull
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Christian Busch busch.christ...@gmx.dewrote:
Hello user group,
I have an issue with unc pathes on a windows machine.
My fossil version is: This is fossil version [6502627a3e] 2011-02-08
12:52:37 UTC
Is there any known restraint regarding unc pathes on
On 02/28/2011 05:09 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
There have been a lot of changes to the Fossil sources over the past
week. If you are able, please compile the latest Fossil from sources
and give it a try. Let me know if you encounter any problems.
Not something about this latest build
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:09:42PM +0200, Ron Aaron wrote:
My gripe is that if fossil already knows what is wrong, it should just
do a rebuild without telling me I should do it...
I disagree, it can be very unwanted if you have a large repository.
E.g. it might require schedulung downtime or
On 02/28/2011 06:15 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
I disagree, it can be very unwanted if you have a large repository.
E.g. it might require schedulung downtime or extra disk space etc.
Ah, well; that is a good point.
___
fossil-users mailing list
Please consider two patches which fix building the trunk's HEAD with
MSVC 6.0.
The first patch is more of a hack -- it works around the absence of the
long long integer size modifier in that ancient compiler. I'm not
sure the patch should go in as is because, for instance sqlite3.* source
files
Hello,
thank you for the hint with the drive letter, I knew this option but I'd
like to avoid this extra step.
I'm only working on windows machines so I don't know whether this is a
windows specific problem or how it looks on other os. For the unc-path I
only can refer to wikipedia:
Please find attached a patch that contains the following changes to
the windows Makefile.mingw
* Build the fossil.exe with the icon file in /win
* Add a setup target to the Makefile to create a windows installer
(requires NSIS)
* Change the Makefile so that SSL enabled builds can be created by
Konstantin,
Thanks. I still build a lot of things with MSVC 6.0 (originally
because it was the last version which didn't need runtime dlls to be
installed, though I don't know if that's still true).
- Venkat
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Khomoutov
At 03:41 PM 2/28/2011, Venkat Iyer wrote:
I still build a lot of things with MSVC 6.0 (originally
because it was the last version which didn't need runtime dlls
to be
installed, though I don't know if that's still true).
Yes and no. Its runtime DLL is included with (essentially) all
versions
14 matches
Mail list logo
