Re: [fossil-users] Client certs - revelation

2011-03-16 Thread Jan Danielsson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: >> I need to read up on ~/.fossil and _FOSSIL_ though to see if there's >> any risk of accidental information leak when pushing/pulling. The >> question is if the client key should be stored in the database, or if >> it's safer to store a referen

[fossil-users] more about the attachment problem

2011-03-16 Thread Ron Wilson
I was peeking around and looked in the Log. I found a record of 2 artifacts representing my latest attempt to attach a file to a ticket. Perhaps the attachments are just not being shown? I did recheck the changes I made to the view ticket page, but I have not made changes to the time line settings

Re: [fossil-users] submodules

2011-03-16 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > Oops--thanks for the correction. I must have been having flashbacks to my SVN > days. > Surprisingly, fossil won't export a copy of the files without repository > info. Closest thing > is the zip command, which will create a zip of all files

Re: [fossil-users] Client certs - revelation

2011-03-16 Thread Joshua Paine
On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:40 PM, "Ron Wilson" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jan Danielsson > wrote: >> On that note.. Planning a little bit further into the future here. Is >> anyone interested in "full" support for PKI in fossil? For instance, >> signing commits using a client key belo

Re: [fossil-users] submodules

2011-03-16 Thread Joshua Paine
On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:11 PM, "Ron Wilson" wrote: > Sorry, export dumps the repository in git-fast-export format, for the > purpose of exporting commits from Fossil to git (or other VCS that can > import git-fast-export format). Oops--thanks for the correction. I must have been having flashbacks

Re: [fossil-users] Client certs - revelation

2011-03-16 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote: > I need to read up on ~/.fossil and _FOSSIL_ though to see if there's > any risk of accidental information leak when pushing/pulling. The > question is if the client key should be stored in the database, or if > it's safer to store a referenc

Re: [fossil-users] submodules

2011-03-16 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > For your original question, the command > is not extract but export. As specified, it just creates the files, which > don't then contain any marker that they came from fossil. Sorry, export dumps the repository in git-fast-export format, for

Re: [fossil-users] Client certs - revelation

2011-03-16 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 03/16/11 00:37, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: >> I figured out why no one is explaining to me how to specify >> which client certificate to use when connecting with https: Because >> fossil doesn't support it yet. :) > > You're right :-) > http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Feature Idea: Mail A Patch

2011-03-16 Thread Gour
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:09:44 -0700 "Zed A. Shaw" wrote: > Any thoughts on a feature to take a diff from a local fossil repo and > email it to someone, who can then put it in their stash? Something > like this: > > fossil mail -r 23234234 > zeds...@zedshaw.com > > Which would send a patch from

Re: [fossil-users] submodules

2011-03-16 Thread Joshua Paine
Wow, didn't know about that either. For your original question, the command is not extract but export. As specified, it just creates the files, which don't then contain any marker that they came from fossil. Joshua Paine LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy http://letterblock.com/ 301-57

Re: [fossil-users] submodules

2011-03-16 Thread trash
Ok, I think I found the solution. The submodule must be integrated by using fossil open --nested That's not documented, but I'm happy there's a solution. From: tr...@tekwissusa.com Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:39 PM To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: [fossil-users] submodu

[fossil-users] attachment problem

2011-03-16 Thread Ron Wilson
The problem with not being able to attach files to tickets seems to be limited to Windows XP. Don't know it it is limited to SP3 because all the PCs around my office that are running XP are SP3. Seems to work in Windows 7 64-bit and on Ubuntu. ___ fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

2011-03-16 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Michael Richter wrote: > > OK, this is the sequence I've tried on my main workstation (Ubuntu 10.04): > > 1. Delete all fossil-scm.org cookies. > 2. Close my browser (Chrome 10.0.648.134). > 3. Re-open my browser. > 4. Go to fossil-scm.org. > 5. Log in. > 6.

Re: [fossil-users] Feature Idea: Mail A Patch

2011-03-16 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Mar 16, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > Any thoughts on a feature to take a diff from a local fossil repo and > email it to someone, who can then put it in their stash? Something like > this: > > fossil mail -r 23234234 zeds...@zedshaw.com ...and as a side-effect allow binary diffs t

[fossil-users] Feature Idea: Mail A Patch

2011-03-16 Thread Zed A. Shaw
Any thoughts on a feature to take a diff from a local fossil repo and email it to someone, who can then put it in their stash? Something like this: fossil mail -r 23234234 zeds...@zedshaw.com Which would send a patch from current to the -r revision to me. I could then save the attachment and do

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

2011-03-16 Thread Benoit Mortgat
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 16:30, Michael Richter wrote: > > OK, this is the sequence I've tried on my main workstation (Ubuntu 10.04): > > 1. Delete all fossil-scm.org cookies. > 2. Close my browser (Chrome 10.0.648.134). > 3. Re-open my browser. > 4. Go to fossil-scm.org. > 5. Log in. > 6. C

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

2011-03-16 Thread Michael Richter
On 16 March 2011 23:15, Michael Richter wrote: > On 16 March 2011 19:21, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Michael Richter wrote: >> >>> The ticket >>> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58 >>> is >>> moving into "show-st

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

2011-03-16 Thread Michael Richter
On 16 March 2011 19:21, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Michael Richter wrote: > >> The ticket >> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58 >> is >> moving into "show-stopper" territory for me. I'm trying to share a >> repositor

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

2011-03-16 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Michael Richter wrote: > The ticket > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58 > is > moving into "show-stopper" territory for me. I'm trying to share a > repository's code through fossil to fossil non-users. The inabilit

[fossil-users] Verifying releases with GPG?

2011-03-16 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
First of all, I just wanted to say that I was thrilled to learn that Fossil has learned a git import/export mechanism. I tried Fossil a while back, but the inability to export data from fossil without diving into internals kept me from spending more time with it. I'm glad that's been addressed in r

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

2011-03-16 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Michael Richter wrote: > The > ticket http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview/305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58 is > moving into "show-stopper" territory for me.  I'm trying to share a > repository's code through fossil to fossil non-users.  The inability t