Re: [fossil-users] Leaves Now Open By Default?

2011-04-26 Thread Ron Wilson
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Accidental forks "happen to me" with alarming frequency, and i would never > notice them without the timeline. They're primarily caused, apparently, by > my not being careful enough when i disable autosync and work on the same > code from mult

Re: [fossil-users] Leaves Now Open By Default?

2011-04-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Eric Junkermann wrote: > 1. To look for forgotten forks. There was a fairly serious one of > these quite early in Fossil's history, though with proper branches and > the graph on the timeline it probably wouldn't happen today. > Accidental forks "happen to me" wi

Re: [fossil-users] Leaves Now Open By Default?

2011-04-26 Thread Eric Junkermann
On 25 Apr 2011, at 21:08, "Zed A. Shaw" wrote: > Branches are not leaves. A leaf is unnamed while a branch has a name. > Branches shouldn't close, but an unnamed leaf that gets merged should > just go away. > I thought that maybe the right question is "why do we care about leaves?". As far as

[fossil-users] trouble with 'localauth'

2011-04-26 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Hi, I've been only occasionally using the web ui on fossil in the last few months, but I seem to have developed a problem with localauth. I forst noticed it when it seemed that I wasn't being automatically logged in. I have since done a test (see below) where I create a new repository, then attem