On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote:
On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi Richard,
I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of
experience
trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not alone in that feeling.
You are very
Worked great for me on two Ubuntu machines. One mildly unusual thing, make
install uses mv to put the binary in /usr/local/bin. Normally I think
autoconf generated Makefiles will use install or a sh script to emulated
install and keeps the executable in the build dir. Probably no big deal but
why
On 10/07/2011, at 6:28 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote:
On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi Richard,
I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of
experience
trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not
On 10/07/2011, at 7:26 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
Worked great for me on two Ubuntu machines. One mildly unusual thing, make
install uses mv to put the binary in /usr/local/bin. Normally I think
autoconf generated Makefiles will use install or a sh script to emulated
install and keeps the
4 matches
Mail list logo