Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

2011-07-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote: Hi Richard, I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of experience trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not alone in that feeling. You are very

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

2011-07-09 Thread Matt Welland
Worked great for me on two Ubuntu machines. One mildly unusual thing, make install uses mv to put the binary in /usr/local/bin. Normally I think autoconf generated Makefiles will use install or a sh script to emulated install and keeps the executable in the build dir. Probably no big deal but why

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

2011-07-09 Thread Steve Bennett
On 10/07/2011, at 6:28 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: On Wed, July 6, 2011 6:11 am, Steve Bennett wrote: Hi Richard, I really dislike autoconf - a feeling cultivated through years of experience trying to use it. And I think I'm probably not

Re: [fossil-users] Needed: volunteer to autoconf Fossil

2011-07-09 Thread Steve Bennett
On 10/07/2011, at 7:26 AM, Matt Welland wrote: Worked great for me on two Ubuntu machines. One mildly unusual thing, make install uses mv to put the binary in /usr/local/bin. Normally I think autoconf generated Makefiles will use install or a sh script to emulated install and keeps the