Ha, never thought there can be fun in this list! :D
> - Original Message -
> From: Remigiusz Modrzejewski
> Sent: 08/05/11 07:07 PM
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] [OT] commit command seems to be slow
>
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 15:14 , Stephan Beal wrote:
One other thought occured to me, which is the possibility that your server
is not actually running on :8080, because you have several fossil servers
open. You might want to check this possibility as well.
Tomek
2011/8/5 Tomek Kott
> There could be one bug, if what you're showing is the actual o
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:29:40AM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> Le 2011-08-05 à 10:17, Remigiusz Modrzejewski a écrit :
>
> >
> > On Aug 5, 2011, at 16:06 , Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> >> Now, what's about this slow commit issue...
> >
> > Wasn't that resolved by setting mtime-based changes?
>
There could be one bug, if what you're showing is the actual output of the
terminal. The reason I say that is the following:
D:\o>fossil open ops
D:\o>fossil ls -l
*
In between those two lines, you should get fossil's output that says
client.txt
project-name:
repository:...
several more li
Le 2011-08-05 à 10:17, Remigiusz Modrzejewski a écrit :
>
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 16:06 , Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
>> Now, what's about this slow commit issue...
>
> Wasn't that resolved by setting mtime-based changes?
>
>
Extra command should not behave the same?
--
Martin
___
On Aug 5, 2011, at 16:06 , Martin Gagnon wrote:
> Now, what's about this slow commit issue...
Wasn't that resolved by setting mtime-based changes?
Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 15:13 , Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> >> If find this a bit misleading. If I said "fossil settings mtime-changes
> >> enabled", I'd like it to tell me: "please say on or off" (or whatever
> single
> >> agreement we com
On Aug 5, 2011, at 15:13 , Martin Gagnon wrote:
>> If find this a bit misleading. If I said "fossil settings mtime-changes
>> enabled", I'd like it to tell me: "please say on or off" (or whatever single
>> agreement we come up with). I don't mind any of the names, but I'd like ot be
>> one pair a
On Aug 5, 2011, at 15:14 , Stephan Beal wrote:
>> ++
>>
>> So why not potato/cucumber? ;)
>>
>
> My Comp-sci teacher back in the 80's always used the word broccoli for such
> cases.
Heh, Broccoli is a name of some big project my team finished just before I
joined ;)
Kind regards,
Remigius
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
wrote:
> ++
>
> So why not potato/cucumber? ;)
>
My Comp-sci teacher back in the 80's always used the word broccoli for such
cases.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
__
Le 2011-08-05 à 04:38, Lluís Batlle i Rossell a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:14:46AM +, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
>> Fossil is flexible here. yes/no, 1/0, on/off, true/false any of these can be
>> used for binary settings. Some settings (like proxy) even can use real proxy
>> addres
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:38 , Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:14:46AM +, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
>> Fossil is flexible here. yes/no, 1/0, on/off, true/false any of these can be
>> used for binary settings. Some settings (like proxy) even can use real proxy
>> addre
On 08/05/2011 11:38 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> If find this a bit misleading. If I said "fossil settings mtime-changes
> enabled", I'd like it to tell me: "please say on or off" (or whatever single
> agreement we come up with). I don't mind any of the names, but I'd like ot be
> one pair
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:14:46AM +, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
> Fossil is flexible here. yes/no, 1/0, on/off, true/false any of these can be
> used for binary settings. Some settings (like proxy) even can use real proxy
> address than on/off. very cool!
Well, you can set a setting to 'pota
Hi, Ron:
Thanks a lot!
I think with or without open repository 'ops' in server, the server should act
equally. This is the test:
Content of tst_server.bat
15 matches
Mail list logo