On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote:
We're not talking about a repository that's being served by an HTTP
server, but about the repository that's on his machine.
However... once a developer clones the repo, if he has it on a public
filesystem then all bets are off.
On 2012-06-12 00:36, Mike Meyer wrote:
My boss just sent me mail that said, and I quote:
Fossil sucks and is actually not compatible with Windows
I'm pretty sure I've seen people here who use it no Windows, and
there's a Windows distribution, which makes me think he's wrong.
His problem is
2012/6/13 Rene renew...@xs4all.nl:
On 2012-06-12 00:36, Mike Meyer wrote:
My boss just sent me mail that said, and I quote:
Fossil sucks and is actually not compatible with Windows
Mike,
...
Better sit down with him and ask him what the problem is, maybe first a few
pints of strong
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net wrote:
I have one central repository, that I use as an archive for a web site. The
web site root directory is actually checkout of the trunk
branch of the repository.
I am using lighttpd server on Linux and fossil as a CGI
On 2012-06-13 19:07, Ron Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net
wrote:
I have one central repository, that I use as an archive for a web
site. The web site root directory is actually checkout of the trunk
branch of the repository.
I am using lighttpd
On 2012-06-13 19:07, Ron Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, John Found johnfo...@evrocom.net
wrote:
I have one central repository, that I use as an archive for a web
site. The web site root directory is actually checkout of the trunk
branch of the repository.
I am using lighttpd
6 matches
Mail list logo
