Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:02:14PM +, Michai Ramakers wrote: apart from the question whether cloning from localhost makes sense or not (I use this from a script to make work from localhost or remote

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
I didn't know the 'analyze' sqlite command, thank you. When trying (I am assuming you meant with '-R' option to point to repo), I got slightly more than I bargained for: [...] Segmentation fault (core dumped) Retried with newer fossil-version [c7133bd79d] from yesterday, and segfault is

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:19:31AM +, Michai Ramakers wrote: Hello, On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:02:14PM +, Michai Ramakers wrote: apart from the question whether cloning from localhost makes sense or

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger I didn't know the 'analyze' sqlite command, thank you. When trying (I am assuming you meant with '-R' option to point to repo), I got slightly more than I bargained for: [snip] Heh, that's for drh. You said sqlite analyze works? Does it

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Michai Ramakers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: Heh, that's for drh. You said sqlite analyze works? Does it help or not? Also... see http://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/info/85233c40c9bb05a87574cdc25402ec0d34b0b7ee : queries seem to be optimised to run without

[fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
hi, I would find it useful if `fossil info' (or `stat', `timeline', or a new command) would provide a means/option to show the total number of revisions (by default or optional), more precisely, the number of file commits (as it is called in `fossil help timeline) in the repo. the

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: ah yes... forgot that :) It does not help. Note that taking 1 cpu core offline ('cpuctl offline 1' here) makes it fly This is just pure speculation, but ... perhaps there is a problem in BSD multi-core cases, such

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:56 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would find it useful if `fossil info' (or `stat', `timeline', or a new command) would provide a means/option to show the total number of revisions (by default or optional), more precisely, the number of file

[fossil-users] main fossil repo is now 2000 days old

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, i just coincidentally saw this on the /stat page of the main fossil repo: Duration Of Project:2000 days or approximately 5.48 years. Happy 2000th day, Fossil! -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i'll sign up for adding that - i would be able to do this on Sunday. i would add it to the status command because we have that info in the /stat page already (and in fossil json stat -full). Don't tell my boss this,

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Eduardo Morras
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:21:50 +0100 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: ah yes... forgot that :) It does not help. Note that taking 1 cpu core offline ('cpuctl offline 1' here) makes it fly This is just

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:35:06 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:56 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would find it useful if `fossil info' (or `stat', `timeline', or a new command) would provide a means/option to show the

Re: [fossil-users] 'fossil clone' from localhost is extremely slow

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote: If he tries in shell 1 fossil open repository fossil server and in shell 2 fossil clone http://localhost:8080/ copy.fossil should workaround it, the repository is opened only once In theory, yes, but the web

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:57 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: ...works like a charm and saves lots of typing (locally chronological rev. nums are much easier to memorize (and to type...) than sha1 hashes). so I still think this would be useful. Explained that way it does

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread Eduardo Morras
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:12:18 +0100 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:57 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: ...works like a charm and saves lots of typing (locally chronological rev. nums are much easier to memorize (and to type...) than

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 1.25

2013-01-10 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Ruediger Haertel r_haer...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, happy new year to all of you. Will there be precompiled versions of v1.25? I remember there was a discussion about this, but don't know what

[fossil-users] Initial patch towards rebase

2013-01-10 Thread Nico Williams
https://chiselapp.com/user/nico/repository/nico Two branches: rebase, and test-rebase. This adds a --nocommit option to the fossil merge command that does... what it sounds like it does: it applies the patch from a --cherrypick commit and leaves that uncommitted. I applied all the commits from

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:51:51 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i'll sign up for adding that - i would be able to do this on Sunday. i would add it to the status command because we have that info in

Re: [fossil-users] Initial patch towards rebase

2013-01-10 Thread Richard Hipp
I don't understand: fossil merge has never done a commit. The --nocommit option seems like a noop to me. What am I misunderstanding? D. Richard Hipp - d...@sqlite.org Sent from phone - pardon brevity On Jan 10, 2013 10:19 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:

[fossil-users] Tags and branches ui

2013-01-10 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, it would be nice if the Tags and Branches ui pages had something more than the names listed. For example, next to each, could be the date of the head or the last commit referred to. What do you think? Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:51:51 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i'll sign up for adding that - i would be able to do this on Sunday. i would add it to the status command because we have that info in

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil info' feature request (a.k.a. wish)

2013-01-10 Thread Stephan Beal
This number is the same one reported from the /stat page for number of commits. i am not sure off-hand whether wiki edits and whatnot are included. (sent from phone from dentist office...) - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal On Jan 10, 2013 5:24 PM,

[fossil-users] Cross-compiling under FreeBSD for Windows

2013-01-10 Thread Maxim Khitrov
For anyone else interested, here are the steps for building fossil.exe with OpenSSL support on a FreeBSD host (9.0-RELEASE-p5 amd64): 1. Install devel/mingw32-gcc, devel/mingw32-zlib, and devel/mingw32-openssl ports. As of this writing, mingw32-zlib (1.2.5) fails to build due to a problem with

[fossil-users] Suggested way to sync to multiple servers?

2013-01-10 Thread org.fossil-scm.fossil-users
Hello. It seems as though it's only really possible to sync to one remote server at a time. Is there a way to specify that a repository should push to multiple remote servers? My use case here is that I've got repositories hosted on http://fossil.io7m.com but I've also got an exact mirror of

[fossil-users] a few newbie questions re. wiki and embedded documentation

2013-01-10 Thread Miles Fidelman
Hi Folks, Just starting to experiment with Fossil for use on a project, and I'd like to use it for documentation as well as code. As I've been playing with the wiki and embedded documentation features, I've noticed a few things that lead to a few questions. Advice would be most welcomed: