Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Edward Berner
On 7/22/2013 4:36 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es mailto:emorr...@yahoo.es wrote: Similar, a C developer role can modify /src dir but not /documentation or /sql, the DBA role can change /sql but not /src and similar. Role

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Edward Berner
On 7/23/2013 7:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es mailto:emorr...@yahoo.es wrote: I must insist here ;) There's a distinction, your repository is not the official Project repository, mine, the central one, yes. That's the

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Edward Berner
On 7/22/2013 4:20 PM, Joseph R. Justice wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net mailto:flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Clark Christensen cdcmi...@yahoo.com mailto:cdcmi...@yahoo.com

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Edward Berner
On 7/22/2013 1:02 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: Hi, Clark! A brief response from the office, and a longer one tonight when i get home... On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Clark Christensen cdcmi...@yahoo.com mailto:cdcmi...@yahoo.com wrote: Scripting language: I understand the Tcl roots, and

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Edward Berner
On 7/22/2013 1:13 AM, Gautier DI FOLCO wrote: 2013/7/22 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com The problem is the interpreter. i am not aware of a small embedable JS interpreter. SpiderMonkey/Jaegermonkey are complex and poorly documented. Google V8 is nice

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread BohwaZ
Le Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:02:47 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com a écrit : The problem is the interpreter. i am not aware of a small embedable JS interpreter. SpiderMonkey/Jaegermonkey are complex and poorly documented. Google V8 is nice but (A) huge, (B) C++, and (C) they recently made

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Edward Berner
On 7/22/2013 7:30 PM, Joseph R. Justice wrote: OS-level peculiarities: There are other multi-platform software projects which have to deal with these, both with peculiarities between similar types of platform, such as the various flavors of Unix and Linux, and between drastically different

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Great! Very informative. Thank you. Do you happen to know if I can build and run programs for cygwin32, in a cygwin64 installation? or I should run two cygwin setups in orthogonally, 32 and 64? On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:33:38AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:21:57PM

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Mark Janssen
I would just like to add that fossil already has a defined API in the sense that what a fossil repo and server are is described in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki and http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/sync.wiki. I would say that any truly useful fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: Do you happen to know if I can build and run programs for cygwin32, in a cygwin64 installation? or I should run two cygwin setups in orthogonally, 32 and 64? I would recommend to compile fossil using: make -f win/Makefile.mingw

[fossil-users] https-login setting

2013-07-24 Thread MaxJarek
Hi, My fossil works over http and https. I want to use setting option https-login but i have trouble. Documentation says: Send login credentials using HTTPS instead of HTTP even if the login page request came via HTTP but this don't working for me. Fossil don't force https login. Any hints?

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:16:19AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: Do you happen to know if I can build and run programs for cygwin32, in a cygwin64 installation? or I should run two cygwin setups in orthogonally, 32 and 64? I would

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: I think our main usage for a cygwin fossil is that we develop using a cygwin terminal with bash and vim. And we want fossil to spawn vim properly on commit. That should work,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: I think our main usage for a cygwin fossil is that we develop using a cygwin terminal with bash and vim. And we want fossil to spawn vim properly on commit. That should work,

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Janssen mpc.jans...@gmail.comwrote: I would just like to add that fossil already has a defined API in the sense that what a fossil repo and server are is described in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki and

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com wrote: Personally, I'd vote for Fossil to remain C89. Specifically I'd like Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 on Windows NT 4.0 to continue to be a usable target. As a matter of course, i never explicitly use any C99 features except

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Warren Young
On 7/24/2013 02:33, Jan Nijtmans wrote: SQLITE_CANTOPEN: os_win.c:34063: (3) winOpen(/var/tmp/etilqs_FoaHNBQa56cVGrh\etilqs_PXfZEjH5dBl8Cm5) - The system cannot find the path specified. I'm not sure whether this is a SQLite 3.7.17 thing or if it is due to one of the build option changes

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Jacek Cała
Hi All, One more feature that I also miss in the current version is selective commit. I mean something which allows you to see changes as a numbered list and then commit selectively e.g. issuing 'fossil commit -range 1-10,15'. It requires that 'fossil changes' is invoked before commit but that's

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: I find this feature very useful and it is very common in clients to SVN, Mercurial, etc. And since fossil has embedded client, I'd really like to see that as well. That one's come up a few times - added to the list. A

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com wrote: Personally, I'd vote for Fossil to remain C89. Specifically I'd like Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 on Windows NT 4.0 to continue to be a usable

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Mark Janssen mpc.jans...@gmail.com wrote: Synchronisation and authentication is definitely not a app-level detail for a DVCS, the actual transport used could be though. In fossil's case authentication is (currently) largely an app-level detail. The core bits

[fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread Petr Pudlák
Dear Fossil users, I have a several year old project that has been managed in several VCS over its lifetime, and for past year or two it has been managed using Fossil. The history of the project contains some ancient code that is not necessary now, but worse, it also contains some ancient

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.comwrote: Why not use more modern features? I mean, I would probably not shift my whole codebase to C++11 just yet, but writing new code using C99? i tried that several times over the past years and (A) C99 doesn't provide

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-24 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hi, On 24 July 2013 13:25, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: I find this feature very useful and it is very common in clients to SVN, Mercurial, etc. And since fossil has embedded client, I'd really like to see that as well. That one's come up a few times - added to the list. A list

Re: [fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Petr Pudlák petr@gmail.com wrote: Dear Fossil users, I have a several year old project that has been managed in several VCS over its lifetime, and for past year or two it has been managed using Fossil. The history of the project contains some ancient code

Re: [fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Jul 24, 2013, at 13:36 , Petr Pudlák wrote: I have a several year old project that has been managed in several VCS over its lifetime, and for past year or two it has been managed using Fossil. The history of the project contains some ancient code that is not necessary now, but worse, it

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Martin Gagnon
Le 24 juil. 2013 06:06, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name a écrit : On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Jan Nijtmans wrote: 2013/7/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: I think our main usage for a cygwin fossil is that we develop using a cygwin terminal with bash and

Re: [fossil-users] admin pages are empty and have bad titles

2013-07-24 Thread Mark Janssen
What happens if you set base_url without trailing slash? e.g. https://foobar.com:10443; On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: I think the point here is that with a baseurl of https://foobar.com:10443/;, certain links exposed by the fossil HTML

Re: [fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread sky5walk
From my Fossil cheat sheet...regarding this mail thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg09584.html - fossil shunning or deleting files permanently. - Use the Admin - Shun page on fossil ui. Then enter the full SHA1 of the artifact to delete. Then

Re: [fossil-users] how to delete old history?

2013-07-24 Thread sky5walk
True, that was already discussed in the attached thread. Some mentioned SQL dumps of artifacts, or you could open your repo in a SQLite browser to get the list. But, at least it works. Automating shuns is high on my list too! At least enable the cmd via fossil.exe and not just the ui? On Wed,

[fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2 - translations

2013-07-24 Thread fvd
For a while I had been meaning to share the configuration file for a Spanish translation to the list. You can find it here: http://versions.southshield.net/fossiles/index And this also serves as an illustration of what I wrote to Stephan Beal earlier with perhaps some additions about what

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Warren Young
On 7/24/2013 05:30, Jan Nijtmans wrote: It looks like SQLite is doing something wrong here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/b88edfefbb That patch is fine on Cygwin as long as you build Fossil with the external SQLite, rather than the bundled SQLite. The bundled SQLite is

Re: [fossil-users] mingw and default ssh command

2013-07-24 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:35:51AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Martin Gagnon on Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:37:27 -0400: I guess when we want to sync with another url, we should have a chance to specify user again (user may be different on the another repo), and it should save the new

Re: [fossil-users] mingw and default ssh command

2013-07-24 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:44:05 -0400: I tried this new version today. There is an improvement in sync terminal output. But it seems that now, if I have a user in the URL and a -l user argument, the user from the URL is used for the fossil authentifcation. (It

Re: [fossil-users] mingw and default ssh command

2013-07-24 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:44:05 -0400: But it seems that now, if I have a user in the URL and a -l user argument, the user from the URL is used for the fossil authentifcation. Thanks for pointing it out: