Re: [fossil-users] default user setting not honored for ticket/wiki changes

2013-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 05:00:24 +0100, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1386648025.gcfjifliejgageloe...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Andy Bradford on 09 Nov 2013 17:08:04 -0700: Please try the following: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/2fe1d8043e I had to make a slight correction.

Re: [fossil-users] default user setting not honored for ticket/wiki changes

2013-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:11:11 +0100, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1386645071.gndkmiklplbpkoddf...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said j. van den hoff on Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:00:04 +0100: If I logout of the web interface and login with an admin user, I will see that the commits were made by

Re: [fossil-users] default user setting not honored for ticket/wiki changes

2013-11-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said j. van den hoff on Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:32:50 +0100: the latter (`myname') is directly and consistently reported as the user doing future commits and wiki as well as ticket changes. this is perfectly how it should be. however: `myname' is reported as having only reader

Re: [fossil-users] default user setting not honored for ticket/wiki changes

2013-11-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said j. van den hoff on Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:44:30 +0100: in my local clone of the repo, however, the _same_ checkin (from somebody (and somewhere) else) is reported as originating from me@myIP (i.e. the `s' user of the local clone). is this a bug or just a misinterpretation of

Re: [fossil-users] default user setting not honored for ticket/wiki changes

2013-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:40:59 +0100, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1386690060.ihfpfjbfobjiejdnd...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said j. van den hoff on Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:32:50 +0100: the latter (`myname') is directly and consistently reported as the user doing future commits and wiki as well

Re: [fossil-users] default user setting not honored for ticket/wiki changes

2013-11-10 Thread j. van den hoff
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:48:42 +0100, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1386690522.gockelcmammhhjjgg...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said j. van den hoff on Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:44:30 +0100: in my local clone of the repo, however, the _same_ checkin (from somebody (and somewhere) else) is reported

[fossil-users] how to re-open trunk?

2013-11-10 Thread Ben Collver
Good morning, I noticed that my trunk is closed in fossil [1]. The relevant timeline is linked below [2]. What is the normal way to re-open trunk? I could not find it in the UI. Thank you, -Ben [1] http://code.rogueclass.org/rcl/brlist?closed [2]

Re: [fossil-users] how to re-open trunk?

2013-11-10 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Ben Collver bencoll...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning, I noticed that my trunk is closed in fossil [1]. The relevant timeline is linked below [2]. What is the normal way to re-open trunk? I could not find it in the UI. Good evening, Ben, IIRC, you just

Re: [fossil-users] how to re-open trunk?

2013-11-10 Thread Ben Collver
Hi Stephan, As a test, I cloned the repository and turned off autosync. In the clone, I added commit e9beac17da to the trunk branch and it appeared to break the timeline. I noticed that commit faf2ad2219 is the first one without the trunk tag. I cloned the repository again, this time adding