[fossil-users] Fossil latest, /dir?ci=trunk issue

2014-04-08 Thread Sergei Gavrikov
Hi SYNOPSIS i. ./fossil version This is fossil version 1.28 [b18f3a5cfb] 2014-04-08 09:37:43 UTC ii. ./fossil ui -P iii. Click on [Code] tab (http://localhost:/dir?ci=trunk) iv. Now if I try to open any directory, e.g. www/ I get an error no such checkin:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil latest, /dir?ci=trunk issue

2014-04-08 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-04-08 15:14 GMT+02:00 Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavri...@gmail.com: no such checkin: b18f3a5cfb8bf40e265d4743191453cf44ab7d33www as it forms the spurious request http://localhost:/dir?name=ci=b18f3a5cfb8bf40e265d4743191453cf44ab7d33www Can anybody confirm this? Confirmed, and

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil latest, /dir?ci=trunk issue

2014-04-08 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: With the earlier commit I didn't take into account that in this tricky line: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/5f55f7fe046?ln=281 A bit of background there: fossil places all path elements after the first

[fossil-users] Error Push

2014-04-08 Thread Paulus Tuerah
I'm still testing my Fossil GUI. First, I turn off autosync: fossil settings autosync 0 For both local and remote repo. For remote repo, I execute fossil ui at port 8080. Then for local repo in my Fossil GUI commit form, click commit automatically do these: - fossil add/delete (for selected

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-08 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote: As for breaking something that used to work (though not very well or consistently), we could certainly put it to a vote. AFAIR the point of collisions with Events has never been mentioned/pointed out before. i,

[fossil-users] revert all files in a dir

2014-04-08 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, assuming I deleted some or all files within a directory of an open repo, can I somehow revert that directory (only), recursively or not? I think there was something for this, but I forgot. This is fossil version 1.28 [d35d075328] 2014-03-19 12:33:15 UTC Michai

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files in a dir

2014-04-08 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 8 April 2014 17:35, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: assuming I deleted some or all files within a directory of an open repo, can I somehow revert that directory (only), recursively or not? I think there

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files in a dir

2014-04-08 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: fossil revert thedir/*.c thx. But the files are... missing :) (i.e. *.c yields nothing.) Ah, right, so *.c won't work there. How about: fossil revert $(fossil ls | grep src/) ? -- - stephan beal

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files in a dir

2014-04-08 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 8 April 2014 17:41, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: fossil revert thedir/*.c thx. But the files are... missing :) (i.e. *.c yields nothing.) Ah, right, so *.c won't work there. How about: fossil

[fossil-users] FIND command inconsistency [69974aaa19]

2014-04-08 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
Hi all, Before I get to the problem I noticed, a little ‘complaint’: I find the fact that many commands work on all branches by default (and without possibility of overriding that default) problematic. If I’m inside a certain branch then I logically (most of the time, at least) only care to

Re: [fossil-users] FINFO command inconsistency [69974aaa19]

2014-04-08 Thread Tony Papadimitriou
And of course I mean FINFO (not FIND), but I always type it as F and in my mind it got memorized as FIND. From: Tony Papadimitriou Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 6:43 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: [fossil-users] FIND command inconsistency [69974aaa19] Hi all, Before I get to the

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-08 Thread Ron Wilson
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/7/2014 8:59 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: To be fair, there is still one type of UUID that will work at a shorter length than 4; events currently do not go through collision detection, so it's possible to view an event

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:58:00 +0200: AFAIR the point of collisions with Events has never been mentioned/pointed out before. i, for one, would be all for the UUID resolution treating events equally, _but_ that opens up potential new UUID ambiguities