Hello,
I'm almost sure this came up here a while ago, but I can't find it:
is it possible to have 'fossil ls' only list files in the current dir
(so, non-recursive)?
Thx,
Michai
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Hi
SYNOPSIS
% fossil test-th-eval set x y; set z \
TH_ERROR: y
% fossil test-th-eval set x y; set z {
TH_ERROR: y
% fossil test-th-eval set x y; set z [
TH_ERROR: y
Take a look on src/th.c:thNextWord(), please. Could we make TH be more
verbose there? See $.02 patch.
./fossil
[Default] On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:51:35 +0200, Michai Ramakers
m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm almost sure this came up here a while ago, but I can't find it:
is it possible to have 'fossil ls' only list files in the current dir
(so, non-recursive)?
Not completely like that, but you
On 10 June 2014 15:33, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote:
[Default] On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:51:35 +0200, Michai Ramakers
m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote:
is it possible to have 'fossil ls' only list files in the current dir
(so, non-recursive)?
Not completely like that, but you can reduce the
On 10 June 2014 15:45, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote:
Alright, thx; that is what I do now ('fossil ls .') . I'm _almost_
certain this has been asked on here, so I'll dit some more :-)
or 'DIG some more', perhaps.
___
fossil-users
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm almost sure this came up here a while ago, but I can't find it:
is it possible to have 'fossil ls' only list files in the current dir
(so, non-recursive)?
i _thought_ ls had a --glob option, but it apparently
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Take a look on src/th.c:thNextWord(), please. Could we make TH be more
verbose there? See $.02 patch.
Thanks for the patch - i'll get this or something equivalent checked in as
soon as i confirm that it doesn't
On 10 June 2014 18:15, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm almost sure this came up here a while ago, but I can't find it:
is it possible to have 'fossil ls' only list files in the current dir
(so,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Excellent, thx. TBH I'm not sure if 'glob' would be the best here -
this is essentially what grep would do (we're in a shell already) -
when ignoring 'ls -v' for a bit.
But it's flexible, yes.
(is '--no-recurse' an
On 10 June 2014 19:01, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Excellent, thx. TBH I'm not sure if 'glob' would be the best here -
this is essentially what grep would do (we're in a shell already) -
when ignoring
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sat, 07 Jun 2014 11:27:24 +0200:
An alternative solution would be to tag them, of course. Ah, and the
commit command seems to have added a --tag feature, which would make
that trivial to do, but also requires re-training years of muscle
memory :/.
On the
11 matches
Mail list logo
