Re: [fossil-users] announce: drop-off site for unofficial Pi/ODroid binaries

2014-07-29 Thread JR
> > i have an Android eMMC module for my odroid, but it won't run on my > particular monitor (which has only a DVI, not native HDMI, and Android > doesn't appear to like that via the adapter). It does run on my tv, though. > At some point i might tinker around with getting sshd and a dev env set up

Re: [fossil-users] announce: drop-off site for unofficial Pi/ODroid binaries

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:22 PM, JR wrote: > Asking off-list in case this is an embarrassingly stupid question. > Replying back to the list because it's a good question and i expected this question to come along at some point ;) > What about an Android ARM build (preferably with SSL enabled)?

Re: [fossil-users] announce: drop-off site for unofficial Pi/ODroid binaries

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > on my Pi, so it will be easy to occasionally post updated binaries for > that platform and the ODroid U3 (i _think_ the binaries might be > compatible, but haven't tried it). So... > Turns out they are: the pi-built binary runs on an odroid:

[fossil-users] announce: drop-off site for unofficial Pi/ODroid binaries

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, last night i scripted the infrastructure to run "almost continuous" builds using various configuration options on my Pi, so it will be easy to occasionally post updated binaries for that platform and the ODroid U3 (i _think_ the binaries might be compatible, but haven't tried it). So...

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for cloning

2014-07-29 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Ron W wrote: > >> the push (assuming autosunc isn't pull-only AND the local repo is not >> no-push). >> > > i didn't know about that option (it's called dont-push, though) > >dont-pushPrevent thi

Re: [fossil-users] looking for a concise way to fetch the tip version uuid

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > fossil descendants? > that looks a lot like the timeline output to me: pi@raspberrypi:/mnt/odroid/fossil/fossil$ f descen === 2014-07-16 === 08:09:43 [e17f7304dd] Update internal tables to Unicode 7.0. (user: jan.nijtmans tag

Re: [fossil-users] looking for a concise way to fetch the tip version uuid

2014-07-29 Thread Richard Hipp
fossil test-name-to-id tip On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Stephan Beal > wrote: > >> Limits: only the most basic of unix tools (no perl, etc, but awk would be >> okay). >> >> Assumptions: the repo has at least one checkin (this is for bu

Re: [fossil-users] looking for a concise way to fetch the tip version uuid

2014-07-29 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:37:24PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: > i'm looking for a simple, shell-scriptable way to get the tip version uuid > from a checkout. Currently i've got this beast: fossil descendants? Joerg ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-u

Re: [fossil-users] looking for a concise way to fetch the tip version uuid

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Limits: only the most basic of unix tools (no perl, etc, but awk would be > okay). > > Assumptions: the repo has at least one checkin (this is for building > precompiled binaries of fossil on my ARM devices). > this one's not bad: echo "sel

[fossil-users] looking for a concise way to fetch the tip version uuid

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, i'm looking for a simple, shell-scriptable way to get the tip version uuid from a checkout. Currently i've got this beast: pi@raspberrypi:/mnt/odroid/fossil/fossil$ f timeline -type ci -n 1 | sed -n 2p | cut -d'[' -f2 | cut -d']' -f1 e17f7304dd Limits: only the most basic of unix tools

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for cloning

2014-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Ron W wrote: > the push (assuming autosunc isn't pull-only AND the local repo is not > no-push). > i didn't know about that option (it's called dont-push, though) dont-pushPrevent this repository from pushing from client to server.

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for cloning

2014-07-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ron W on Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:25:08 -0400: > Making autosync default to pull-only would not impact minimize > unintentional forks. Actually, it would. Consider this scenario. Tizio clones and uses default autosync. Caglio clones and enabled pull-only. Tizio commits something. C

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for cloning

2014-07-29 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Baruch Burstein on Sun, 27 Jul 2014 23:31:17 +0300: > > Maybe this should be the default always, even if I have write > > permission, in order to prevent accidental pushes? > > I believe changing the default for autosyn

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion for cloning

2014-07-29 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > > When cloning a repository, if I don't have write privileges, can > > autosync by default be set to "pullonly" in the clone, to prevent > > annoying "pull only - not authorized to push"? > > Are you suggesting that the clone dete