On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:07:48 -0600
Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
Interesting you should write this. One of my newest uses for fossil
is the one case in which I'm using it distributed (even though all by
myself): My blog (such as it is). It is not a unique idea at all, but
I
Hello,
On 3 September 2014 09:12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:07:48 -0600
Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
Interesting you should write this. One of my newest uses for fossil
is the one case in which I'm using it distributed (even though all by
myself):
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:26 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
(2) Fossil's purpose is to be able to recreate historical versions of the
project - exactly. It cannot do that if historical images have been
deleted.
I understand the purity intended, but continue to be frustrated by it. :)
I
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:47:14 -0400
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
(2) Create a new fossil bundle export command that generates a
bundle from a designated branch, or all check-ins following a
particular check-in, or just a single check-in. The bundle format is
an SQLite database file
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:29:41 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
It occurred to me today that in nearly 31 years of using a computer i
have, in total, lost more data to git (while following the
instructions!!!) than any other single piece of software. Also
concluded is that git is
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
(5) Create a new command and perhaps a new web page that will publish
(make public) a private branch or check-in. I don't yet know what
this command is called. (publish? Other suggestions?)
'publish' sounds good to me.
Other
Thus said Andreas Kupries on Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:23:33 -0700:
That information is part of a regular pull operation, so if we can
invoke only the steps to get that, without actually sending any
content back, then your new tool knows what the other side has.
Is it as simple as
Thus said Andy Bradford on Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:39:32 -0600:
Is it as simple as taking the contents referenced in the unsent table
and putting them into a mini Fossil that has just those artifacts (and
perhaps any requisite predecessors).
Excluding any artifacts referenced in the private
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
Thus said Andreas Kupries on Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:23:33 -0700:
That information is part of a regular pull operation, so if we can
invoke only the steps to get that, without actually sending any
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:51:10 -0400:
For example, suppose the person wanting to generate the patch had
actually cloned their clone of the repo, and done pushing and pulling
between his two clones. Then the UNSENT table would have been emptied
on both clones
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, Fossil is intentionally designed around the feature
set provided by SQLite. Therefore, to support DB back-ends other than
SQLite would not just require rewriting SQL queries, but significant
re-working of
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:35 PM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote:
I have no idea whether this is feasible or not. I don't really know how
different SQLite's SQL dialect is from other databases --- since
discovering SQLite I haven't really felt a need to get into MySQL or
Postgres --- and
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
(3) Create a new fossil bundle import command that imports a bundle as a
*private* branch.
Require a branch name as an argument and there will be no need to
think about branch name collisions.
It doesn't matter that the branch
Hi all,
I am having a strange problem with Fossil. I and a friend are
collaborating on a project together, and everything has been working
just fine up until now. Today when I tried to grab the latest commit
which I knew he had made, it told me that I already have the latest
version. However
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com
wrote:
I should mention that the version of Fossil that is on the server is about
10 months older than the one we both have locally on our machines. Can that
be a problem?
Please try a newer version if you can. This
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please try a newer version if you can. This mysterious problem has come up
several times in the past year, once quite recently with a long thread with
people chasing it down. i don't recall if it was resolved, though.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a strange problem with Fossil. I and a friend are
collaborating on a project together, and everything has been working just
fine up until now. Today when I tried to grab the latest commit which I
Hi Stephan,
That did fix the problem. Thanks for the quick response!
Kind regards,
Philip Bennefall
On 9/3/2014 9:39 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please try a newer version if you can. This
On 9/3/2014 9:39 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com
mailto:phi...@blastbay.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a strange problem with Fossil. I and a friend are
collaborating on a project together, and everything has been
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Philip Bennefall phi...@blastbay.com
wrote:
That fixed the problem immediately. Thanks! I only have one question. Was
this a problem that could be said to be on the server side or the client
side?
Server side, if I recal correctly.
--
D. Richard Hipp
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
What i do remember, though, is this coming up as a potentially workaround:
fossil pull --verily
Hast someone been reading Shakespeare's Star Wars?
___
fossil-users mailing
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
fossil pull --verily
Hast someone been reading Shakespeare's Star Wars?
Why doth thou ask?
It wasn't my choice of --flag name ;), i only read about
Thus said Philip Bennefall on Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:50:28 +0200:
Was this a problem that could be said to be on the server side or the
client side?
The problem that was recently corrected was server side.
Did one of you recently make a largish checkin (as in a large number of
artifacts)?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
fossil pull --verily
Hast someone been reading Shakespeare's Star Wars?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8265249
Github gets split diffs, everybody rejoices.
-bch
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Stephan Beal wrote:
--===0605817196==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba9828059d4a905022fb60a
--047d7ba9828059d4a905022fb60a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:39
Richard Hipp wrote:
--===1631061293==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04ace7469e00502303533
--047d7bb04ace7469e00502303533
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Will Parsons varro@nodomain.invalid wrote:
Ha! Thou speakest well! (And get the grammar right!) I do have to
admit that verily is more characteristic of the KJV Bible than
Shakespeare,though...
I recently read Shakespeare's Star Wars: Verily, A New Hope,
28 matches
Mail list logo
