NB// there are two general contexts for a merge, merge from a branch or
merge from a node. When merging from a node there is no ambiguity and this
conversation does not apply. However when merging from a branch there *is*
ambiguity. The don't sync crowd sees the merge as applying to the tip of
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:58 AM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote:
Yeah shunning is a really big stick. If I understand it correctly, if
you ever shunned a 0-length file, you would never be able to commit a
zero-length file again!
Er that's an excellent point. Perhaps we need to
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:12:02 +0200, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com
wrote:
NB// there are two general contexts for a merge, merge from a branch or
merge from a node. When merging from a node there is no ambiguity and
this
conversation does not apply. However when merging from a branch there
[Default] On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:29:36 +0200, j. v. d. hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:12:02 +0200,
Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:58:25 -0700,
Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
[]
autosync. For
most of us bandwidth is
On 2014-10-13T06:40:37 +0100
Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Below is one of my ticket report pages. I'm not entirely sure it's the best
approach but works fine for me. What it does is two selects. The inner
select classifies status, priority, severity and difficulty so then I
On Oct 13, 2014 7:42 AM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote:
On 13 October 2014 04:54, Tony Papadimitriou to...@acm.org wrote:
The claim that once you shun a 0-length file you will not be able to
commit another 0-length file again is not entirely true. If you first
delete the existing
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
Auto sync before merge and after tagging would have saved me a few support
calls from confused users over the past few years :)
The after tagging: part I agree with.
*Maybe* in the case of bringing in the latest from
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
On Oct 13, 2014 7:42 AM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote:
pointing out what a big stick this was. Perhaps pointing out this
edge-case in the documentation or the shunning web page would be
sufficient (or a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:58 PM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote:
Yeah shunning is a really big stick.
Probably better to quarantine than to auto-shun Any content flagged as
quarantined could be reviewed, then any that's truly spam shunned. (Any
illegal (or otherwise illegitimate) may be
9 matches
Mail list logo
