On Feb 18, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
>
> I prefer monospaced fonts for most things that I do with text.
We have hundreds of years of evidence that it is easier to read prose in a
proportional font than in a monospace font. It’s been studied to death.
However, not everything is
Thank you for the suggestion, exporting reports from the CLI has it's uses,
but what I was trying to do is to provide links to an external system.
I noticed that using an "_" at the start of a column name makes it possible
to use wiki strings, which would successfully create links, but the problem
Thus said =?koi8-r?B?7cnOxNLP1yDl18fFzsnK?= on Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:32:02 +0300:
> There's no BASELINE mentioned in Usage header, it's CHECKIN now, so
> I'm sure this is a leftover from the previous version, and probably
> this should be fixed (BASELINE to CHECKIN in the details text).
Thank
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:43:15 -0500:
> I have switched the default Fossil repo over to using the San
> Francisco Modern skin. Everybody seems to think it looks a lot better,
> and I agree.
It does look better, but it lacks a background color. :-)
Andy
--
TAI64 ti
Thus said "Ashwin Hirschi" on Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:32:57 +0100:
> Yeah, it feels a bit counter-intuitive: monospaced fonts are usually
> associated with "old things" [;-)]. But using them for the check-in
> links really helps make the timeline easier to read.
I prefer monospaced fonts for mos
Thus said "j. van den hoff" on Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:44:47 +0100:
> doing the exact same cloning command after login to the server (i.e.
> via a ssh connection to "itself") the clone is just fine. whether an
> accidental coincidence or not: this happened today and just one day
> after I upda
Hello All,
On 15 February 2015 at 20:49, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Adjustments have been made to the new look. Prototypes:
>
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/skin2
> http://52.10.34.196/fossil
>
> The latter is a transient AC2 instance used for prototyping. It has
> the two new menu items "Docs"
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Fadi Mansour <
fadi.redeemer.mans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I managed to customize the "View Ticket" page to create links from the
> text found in this field, but for reports, there's only the query, and I'm
> not sure if I have access to the logic that is rendering t
I haven't specified any mime-type (I'm not sure how or where to set this),
I only added a new field to the tickets schema, of type text.
I managed to customize the "View Ticket" page to create links from the text
found in this field, but for reports, there's only the query, and I'm not
sure if I h
Hello All,
>From this page, it looks like I can run a fossil search on the cli for
timeline check-in comments:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=search
My test repo has only five check-ins with very short comments:
2015-02-18
01:48
[9b6c6c17020e] Leaf: remove line (user: sean, tags:
Hello,
I have the latest fossil on my system:
$ fossil version
This is fossil version 1.30 [1df1b41c86] 2015-01-19 11:29:00 UTC
and the `fossil help timeline` shows the following:
Usage: fossil timeline ?WHEN? ?CHECKIN|DATETIME? ?OPTIONS?
The BASELINE can be any unique prefix of 4 c
Hi Michai,
On 17 February 2015 at 16:24, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> Talking of documentation, and just out of curiosity: does anyone know
> if there are plans to update Jim Schimp's Fossil book (by himself or
> anyone else)? I'm somehow comparing this to the FreeBSD Handbook
> w.r.t. FreeBSD project
On 17 February 2015 at 15:43, Richard Hipp wrote:
> I think the next step of the ongoing Fossil makeover should be to
> improve the homepage:
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki
>
> Suggestions and especially mockups of how this front page should look
> are welcomed.
>
> W
On 2/18/15, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed this article today:
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/selfhost.wiki
>
> And visited the two repos; both are very much in sync but are running
> bf681039e2.
>
> Is it usually the case to keep those on the equivalent of -release an
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:43:15 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote:
I have switched the default Fossil repo over to using the San
Francisco Modern skin. Everybody seems to think it looks a lot
better, and I agree.
execpt, maybe the fixed-width layout ...
I think the next step of the ongoing Fossil ma
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:12:37 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
On 2015-02-17 23:43, Richard Hipp wrote:
I have switched the default Fossil repo over to using the San
Francisco Modern skin. Everybody seems to think it looks a lot
better, and I agree.
I like the look, but why the fixed width? I like
On 2015-02-17 23:43, Richard Hipp wrote:
I have switched the default Fossil repo over to using the San
Francisco Modern skin. Everybody seems to think it looks a lot
better, and I agree.
I like the look, but why the fixed width? I like the flexible width of
the original skin more.
Roy
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
