Ah, no, not yet. Is this something I can fax or must it be mailed?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On 3/9/15, Chad Clabaugh chadclaba...@gmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean. Modified and tested in Firefox, Chrome, IE.
Brilliant. Thanks. The arrows
I see what you mean. Modified and tested in Firefox, Chrome, IE.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On 3/6/15, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On 3/6/15, Chad Clabaugh chadclaba...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to offer the attached patch to timeline.c
On 3/9/15, Chad Clabaugh chadclaba...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, no, not yet. Is this something I can fax or must it be mailed?
For this, an emailed scan will be sufficient.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
On 3/9/15, Chad Clabaugh chadclaba...@gmail.com wrote:
I see what you mean. Modified and tested in Firefox, Chrome, IE.
Brilliant. Thanks. The arrows look *really good* on a 300DPI tablet now!
Do I already have a Contributor's Agreement on file from you?
Am 09.03.2015 um 10:09 schrieb Jan Nijtmans:
Done now:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8cf976d24689ae9e
This means that whatever happens with fossil rm|mv|delete, the
fossil rename and fossil forget will continue to function as
they do now.
Hurray and thank you!
Will
This has nothing to do with mapped drives. You'll get not found with
any drive root -- C:\, D:\...
Fossil cuts off the trailing backslash with the result that stat() resp
lstat() returns an error = not found.
I'm not shure whether and if yes in which function(s) --
file_canonical_name(),
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:06:59 -0400:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=1
(1) because the relationship to the node from which the arrow originates
is more
On 3/9/15, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Perhaps if there were
15--20 rails, where they were taking up a disproportionate amount of
space (2) might make a big enough difference.
Oh, it does. Try a graph with n=all and you'll see. When you start
to get a lot of rails,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=1
I personally prefer 2. Initially 1 looks more aesthetically pleasing,
Which timeline graph do you prefer:
(1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=cinomo=1
The difference is in the merge lines. Other examples:
(1) https://core.tcl.tk/tk/timeline?y=cinomo=0
(2)
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Fossil 1.31 has been published to the SlackBuild website.
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.1/development/fossil/
Very cool. I still didn't get around to making the Haiku packages yet,
even though the build recipe
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Henry Adi Sumarto
henry.adisuma...@gmail.com wrote:
(either by adding or by ignoring the file). Shouldn't fossil warn me about
the extra files? Or is it intended to work that way?
The behaviour you are seeing is as expected. Fossil requires that you tell
it
Hi,
When there is a file change in an existing repository and there is another
new file that has not been added into the repository, and then I commit the
change without adding the new file (let's say I forget to add!), I notice
that fossil lets me commit without resolving what to do with the new
2015-03-06 16:58 GMT+01:00 Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com:
On 06/03/15 15:10, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
Any objections against adding fossil forget as alias
to fossil rm If not, I'll be glad to add it, awaiting
further discussion.
No objection. I'm even going to go so far as to
On 3/8/15, Svyatoslav Mishyn j...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hello,
for example:
padding: 1px 0;
see:
https://cloud.openmailbox.org/public.php?service=filest=27ee378f8bdc47ebcd06069d907916fc
What is that hyperlink suppose to demonstrate? I do not understand
why extra padding is needed.
--
(Mon, 09 Mar 06:15) Richard Hipp:
On 3/8/15, Svyatoslav Mishyn j...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hello,
for example:
padding: 1px 0;
see:
https://cloud.openmailbox.org/public.php?service=filest=27ee378f8bdc47ebcd06069d907916fc
What is that hyperlink suppose to demonstrate? I do not
16 matches
Mail list logo
