I think I found the answer myself: the relevant checkin seems to be
[1fee0377e4] (feb. 11, 2015). sorry for the noise.
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:43:43 +0200, j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I lost track of what exactly has happened w.r.t. to the previously
variable-length
For reference, a **rough** comparison (diff't repo) -- this repository
does *NOT* have the blob index (suggested by drh) that I manually
applied to NetBSD-src:
kamloops$ time fossil pull
Pull from http://pkgsrc.sonnenberger.org
Round-trips: 4 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 177
Pull done, sent:
On 4/27/15, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Thus said bch on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:33:28 -0700:
kamloops$ time fossil pull
Pull from http://netbsd.sonnenberger.org
Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0
Pull done, sent: 338 received: 1368 ip: 135.28.13.11
1.43
On 4/28/15, bch brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
For reference, a **rough** comparison (diff't repo) -- this repository
does *NOT* have the blob index (suggested by drh) that I manually
applied to NetBSD-src:
kamloops$ time fossil pull
Pull from http://pkgsrc.sonnenberger.org
Round-trips: 4
kamloops$ fossil version
This is fossil version 1.32 [440ed5da09] 2015-04-27 23:54:38 UTC
And to be clear -- I'm not complaining about that latest pull -- this
set of metrics we're collecting and this testing is incredibly
low-tech, so it's hard to infer very much from them. I mention that
the
First of all, is this the intended behavior?
Secondly, is this common enough to warrant complicating the processing of
the existing --ignore option?
If yes and yes, then syntax you propose seems unnatural to me. How about:
--ignore +CSG (a la NET-SNMP mibdirs handling, maybe allow for -CSG
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Hankins
jhank...@homewood.k12.al.us wrote:
First of all, is this the intended behavior?
The --ignore option behaves as documented.
Secondly, is this common enough to warrant complicating the processing of
the existing --ignore option?
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
