Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY ?

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Ron W wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:10:36PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On 6/17/15, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity;

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY ?

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:10:36PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On 6/17/15, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity; why aren't pulls 100% read-only on the server? The

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_BUSY ?

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: I'm aware of the sync protocol. My point is that all clusters should already exist on the public master repository as part of other sync operations and I would strongly argue that this is the case that should

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix repo that has checkin with wrong date

I did a small investigation on my issue. It is a 'rebuild' time... During 'manifest_crosslink()' a record with wrong date of manifest is inserted into 'event' table and at the same time into 'time_fudge' table, because manifest date is far future. On some calls to 'manifest_crosslink()', a