Re: [fossil-users] Completely untagged commits ?

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > From what i remember in libfossil, it is possible to go from private to > public, but never the reverse. Mixing private content with public in a > commit causes, if i'm understanding the code correctly, the whole

Re: [fossil-users] Completely untagged commits ?

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:32 PM, bch wrote: > On 1/5/16, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 1/5/16, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Even after rebuilding, the check-in shows up as "unpublished". > > There's a bug somewhere in the "private" tag handling.

Re: [fossil-users] Completely untagged commits ?

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > i agree with Andy B. that "publish" is not the right command here - that's > intended for bundles, as i understand it. i've no experience with bundles. > The docs suggest it's also applicable to ant private artifacts

Re: [fossil-users] Empty files in fossil-generated zip archives

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > Thanks for the report. Should be fixed, here: > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/vinfo/18607?sbs=0 Completely unrelated: i thought the UID output had been changed to output at least enough of a UID

Re: [fossil-users] Empty files in fossil-generated zip archives

Florian Balmer wrote: > > 7-Zip lists "D" as the attributes for empty files in the > fossil-generated zips, and `zipinfo' on my FreeBSD web server lists > "drwxr-xr-x". > Thanks for the report. Should be fixed, here: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/vinfo/18607?sbs=0