Re: [fossil-users] Subversion revision tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > Subversion revision tagging works fine but has the drawback of > cluttering the tag list. The Subversion repository I'm working with has > over 10K revisions, so that means 10K tags dumped in the tag list, which > I would have preferred to keep

Re: [fossil-users] Subversion incremental delta import

2016-05-22 Thread Baruch Burstein
That was my original plan for the svn import. The table should be populated based on the "svn-version-XXX" tags already present in the repo. I just never got around to doing it. On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > Is the Subversion import code supposed to work with incremental de

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
Can you please show me where I can find version history of the ticket report SQL statement? I have been copy and pasting this into a text file in order to get versioning on it…but if fossil is versioning it already then I don’t need to, but I was not able to see any way to do that. On May 22

Re: [fossil-users] possible to change checkin?

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
Ok, so if I have this straight… the simple answer is “no”. Fossil is, by design, not going to let me modify a checkin once it has gone into the DB, fair enough.. I’m not aware of this reparent fork…are you saying that is a fork of fossil itself that lets us cheat a little? I’m not really re

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/22/2016 3:53 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > I’m sorry I’m not seeing anywhere that ticket “reports” are contained as > versioned artifacts… Ticket reports are formatted the same as changes. -- Andy Goth | signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [fossil-users] keep-glob

2016-05-22 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/22/2016 4:43 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2016-05-22 1:05 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth: >> What is keep-glob good for? Does anyone use it in their projects? Or >> the -keep option to clean? > > I use it for protecting the built fossil executable being cleaned. So I > can do ".\fossil.exe clean " wi

Re: [fossil-users] possible to change checkin?

2016-05-22 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/22/2016 3:52 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > Let’s say I have added file A…then never commit it… > > a couple days later I add file B and hit commit > > Suddenly I realize that two files were committed. I want them both > commited, but I want them committed as seperate checkins. > > I can move th

Re: [fossil-users] keep-glob

2016-05-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2016-05-22 1:05 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth: > What is keep-glob good for? Does anyone use it in their projects? Or > the -keep option to clean? I use it for protecting the built fossil executable being cleaned. So I can do ".\fossil.exe clean " without the danger that fossil.exe would clean itself

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2016-05-22 4:03 GMT+02:00 Joe Mistachkin: > Andy Goth wrote: >> My recommendation is to keep the promise made by the current addremove >> documentation. That is to say, make extras and adds be equal. This >> means changing the extras command to also ignore files matched by >> clean-glob: extras =

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
I’m sorry I’m not seeing anywhere that ticket “reports” are contained as versioned artifacts… On May 22, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > On 5/22/2016 3:42 PM, Steve Schow wrote: >> On May 22, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Ron W wrote: >>> Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts. >> >> Are tick

Re: [fossil-users] possible to change checkin?

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
I’m still lost how I can split a checkin into two checkins.. let me try again… Let’s say I have added file A…then never commit it… a couple days later I add file B and hit commit Suddenly I realize that two files were committed. I want them both commited, but I want them committed as seperat

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/22/2016 3:42 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > On May 22, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Ron W wrote: >> Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts. > > Are ticket reports stored as versioned artifacts? http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki#tktchng -- Andy Goth | signature.asc De

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/22/2016 3:22 PM, Ron W wrote: > My team and I don't have a use for a clean command in a VCS. The build > systems "knows" how to clean up files it creates. Any other files not > managed by the VCS are the responsibility of the user. > > I know some people like "clean" to help with making clean

Re: [fossil-users] possible to change checkin?

2016-05-22 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/22/2016 2:10 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > Is there currently any way in fossil to take a checkin and seperate > one of the files in the checkin to a seperate checkin? > > Sometimes I occasionally hit commit and after committing realize there > was another unrelated file that I had added earlier f

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
with regards to this statement… On May 22, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Ron W wrote: > Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts. Are ticket reports stored as versioned artifacts? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
ok, but the ticket table does not contain artifacts. It was not obvious to me that tickets are under version control in another place. It is now. On May 22, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Ron W wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > Thanks for that information. I was not aware t

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Ron W
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > On 5/21/2016 9:03 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Andy Goth wrote: > >> The clean command has gotten very complicated, > > > > Unfortunately, most of the complexity is necessary and removing or > > changing the semantics would risk breaking exist

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Ron W
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > On 5/21/2016 9:03 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Andy Goth wrote: > >> The clean command has gotten very complicated, so I further advocate > >> removing the -emptydirs and -dotfiles options and making them always > >> be in effect. Empty direc

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Ron W
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > Thanks for that information. I was not aware that ticket changes involved > artifacts also. > Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts. The DB serves as artifact storage, indexing of artifacts and a convenient cache of data from the artif

[fossil-users] possible to change checkin?

2016-05-22 Thread Steve Schow
Is there currently any way in fossil to take a checkin and seperate one of the files in the checkin to a seperate checkin? Sometimes I occasionally hit commit and after committing realize there was another unrelated file that I had added earlier for something entirely different. So two files e

Re: [fossil-users] Push to multiple remote urls at once

2016-05-22 Thread Martin Gagnon
> Le 22 mai 2016 à 07:23, Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> a écrit : > > Hi, > > I want to keep two remote backups of my repository. Can I configure > fossil to push to multiple URLs on "push"? Or, is there a better way to > make redundant backups of fossil repositories? > > Tom You can

[fossil-users] Push to multiple remote urls at once

2016-05-22 Thread Thomas Levine
Hi, I want to keep two remote backups of my repository. Can I configure fossil to push to multiple URLs on "push"? Or, is there a better way to make redundant backups of fossil repositories? Tom ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-s