Thus said Paolo Bolzoni on Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:18:10 +0100:
> What happened is that I got an update of these files and the new
> version changed the order of most the keys, but it changed only few
> values. However, this changes in the order made the fossil diffs
> confusing and lar
On 4 Dec 2017, 11:12 AM +0800, Richard Hipp , wrote:
> On 12/3/17, Steve Landers wrote:
> > The llnk for draft1 is https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/draft1/timeline
>
> At https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/draft1/timeline?c=106fe6 the
> yellow highlight color only covers the date and the graph, no
On 12/3/17, Steve Landers wrote:
> The llnk for draft1 is https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/draft1/timeline
At https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/draft1/timeline?c=106fe6 the
yellow highlight color only covers the date and the graph, not the
comment.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
__
The llnk for draft1 is https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/draft1/timeline
On 4 Dec 2017, 11:07 AM +0800, Steve Landers , wrote:
> Draft1 omits the borders around checkins in the Modern View, and adds a
> subtle background color for any commits that are not already colored.
>
> The rationale is tha
Draft1 omits the borders around checkins in the Modern View, and adds a subtle
background color for any commits that are not already colored.
The rationale is that horizontal lines are “visual noise” that draw the eye
from the content of the check-in. Removing the horizontal lines also gives a
On 2017-11-24 9:35, Richard Hipp wrote:
Which is better?
A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline
B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline
They both use too much vertical screen space, IMO.
Also:
A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c
B: https://www.fossil-scm
6 matches
Mail list logo
