Re: [fossil-users] Restoring previous timeline look

2018-02-10 Thread Chris Rydalch
Wonderful, thank you very much Richard! On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/10/18, Chris Rydalch wrote: > > Ah, looks like it's technote background colors which aren't showing in > 2.5; > > my timeline view was only technotes. Is

Re: [fossil-users] Restoring previous timeline look

2018-02-10 Thread Richard Hipp
On 2/10/18, Chris Rydalch wrote: > Ah, looks like it's technote background colors which aren't showing in 2.5; > my timeline view was only technotes. Is this a bug perhaps? Now fixed on trunk. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___

Re: [fossil-users] Restoring previous timeline look

2018-02-10 Thread Richard Hipp
On 2/10/18, Chris Rydalch wrote: > Ah, looks like it's technote background colors which aren't showing in 2.5; > my timeline view was only technotes. Is this a bug perhaps? Yes. This came about because of the effort to move toward a strict CSP, and removal of all in-line

Re: [fossil-users] Restoring previous timeline look

2018-02-10 Thread Roy Keene
Verbose view restores most, but not all, of the look. Here are two otherwise identical repos: 1. Fossil 2.5 (wrong): https://core.tcl.tk/tcltls/timeline?ss=v=50=ci=0 2. Fossil 2.4 (right): http://tcltls.rkeene.org/timeline That said, to me the Fossil 2.5 one in verbose mode

Re: [fossil-users] Restoring previous timeline look

2018-02-10 Thread Chris Rydalch
Ah, looks like it's technote background colors which aren't showing in 2.5; my timeline view was only technotes. Is this a bug perhaps? https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?ss=v=200=e=0 The verbose view does restore the look, thank you! On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:34 AM, Richard Hipp

Re: [fossil-users] Restoring previous timeline look

2018-02-10 Thread Richard Hipp
On 2/9/18, Chris Rydalch wrote: > > Is this behavior hard-coded in newer versions of Fossil, or can it be > changed in a skin's css? I thought I'd followed that discussion close > enough, but I expected the skins to control the behavior so I'm clearly > missing something...