On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 9:33 PM Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 6/3/18, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > So, if anybody sees any last minute tidying up that we need to do...
>
> For example, on the front page
> (https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki), what if
> I add some text to item 8
[Response intentionally CC'd to the original poster, on the off chance he's
not already subscribed to the mailing list]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
off...@riseup.net> wrote:
This is just kind of a next semester project, but I would like to start
> exploring
On Nov 28, 2017 11:08 AM, "Mike Burns" wrote:
As much as I agree, software in general has moved on. You won't get
> Fossil/SQLite running on a Commodore 64 without a lot of work.
> With legacy platforms come legacy software that is either no longer
> supported by the
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote:
2014/1/4 James Turner ja...@calminferno.net:
I won't begin to tell you how to develop fossil but I do want to throw
out there that OpenBSD has been providing fossil with
--disable-internal-sqlite via it's ports
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/7 Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.com:
May I ask why that run-time check cannot or should not be made in the
release version of Fossil 1.28, rather than immediately after it is
tagged
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/4 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:
(3) After SQLite 3.8.3 is released, release fossil 1.28 with
the EXACT SQLite 3.8.3 amalgamation included.
I assume you do not mean here that Fossil v 1.28 should be
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
OK, so I propose the following fix:
[...]
(2) Remove the --disable-internal-sqlite option on trunk. Require the
use of the built-in SQLite only, since SQLite needs to be built with
non-standard compile-time options to
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
OK, so I propose the following fix:
[...]
(2) Remove the --disable
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
More generally, trying to ensure that a) there's only one copy of
every library in the distro/OS, b) all version dependencies match up,
is *super* hard, if not impossible. Eventually there are some very
commonly used
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Roy Marples r...@marples.name wrote:
On 03/01/2014 16:41, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:36:26PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
Can fossil create an archive (tarball, zip file, etc) from a given
artifact id WITHOUT using the web
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
Further, in the embedded software world at least, I expect it is often
difficult or even impossible to update software in the first place
[Top-posting considered harmful. *cough*]
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/2/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
The silly requirement of some distributions that *everything* must be a
shared library irks me beyond words. I hate having to
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
[Top-posting considered harmful. *cough*]
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/2/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
The silly requirement of some distributions
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.ukwrote:
I've written a backup/archival tool based on content-addressible
storage, and a common question people ask is So why don't I just put my
home directory/entire filesystem in git, then?, and I have to raise
this
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Benedikt Ahrens
benedikt.ahr...@gmx.netwrote:
Hello,
I am having trouble with a fossil repository containing many binary files.
The fossil version is the one packaged in Debian Wheezy:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:05 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest: fossil is happy to run wherever it can, and strives for
portability wherever it can, whenever it makes sense.
Any OS is welcome to modify/redistribute fossil in the terms described in
the license.
Well,
at 4:30 AM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
...Some random thoughts on Fossil v2 as a library (call it libfossil2)
and as a default client / server binary which makes use of the library
(call it fossil2client or fossil2scm, I seem to have used both names),
which I realize you might
[Effing GMail sent this before it was fully responded to. My fault for
writing my response using the GMail web interface instead of composing it
in a text editor like a Real Programmer would have done.]
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
My apologies
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Clark Christensen
cdcmi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Scripting language: I understand the Tcl roots, and I hope you would
consider Javascript as a target. JS
19 matches
Mail list logo