with these files.
Should I even be expecting this to work? The nice bit about the fossil file
is that periodically, I can just hand it over to Amazon deep freeze cold
storage, whereas with git I would need an additional packaging step.
Thoughts? Am I crazy?
-Kumar
. fossil help stash not implemented.
2. stash doesn't have a UI. Not important, just
convenient to view the stash and the diffs visually.
Regards,
-Kumar
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote
of the checkout is that of the code *before* your changes.
So a stash is a commit followed by a checkout of the earlier version.
Again .. that stash combines the two steps in one command is a
convenience, not a necessity.
As for scenario (3), you're right. Fossil doesn't need stash to do this.
Regards,
-Kumar
Would that be equivalent to something like git stash?
For the same situation in git, I stash my uncommitted
local changes before merging in and then pop the stash
to resolve any merge conflicts.
-Kumar
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Jeff Rogers dv...@diphi.com wrote:
Local edits being lost
somewhere in the repo?
Q2: fossil ui is nice. However, I'm missing search - like what git gui
gives. What do fossil-ites use for searching the repo? Just straight
database search?
Cheers,
-Kumar
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
:D I knew someone would ask that!
Its not all source (as if I had to say that). There are some media
files tracked as well (images, audio clips and video clips)
that are part of the shipping product .. and about 3 years worth
history of those.
-Kumar
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Zed A. Shaw
that the search index shouldn't sync.
Cheers,
-Kumar
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
David Shinn wrote:
Because fossil stores artifacts as zlib compressed deltas, full text
searching
using the existing fossil SQLite database is not possible. One would
either have
to create a separate database containing the full set of artifacts or
create a
program to reconstruct each
8 matches
Mail list logo
